iRubric: English 102 rubric

The paper does not address prompt.
The major points of the paper are not clear and /or persuasive.

The paper does not adequately respond to prompt.
The major points are addressed, but each on is not well supported.
The research is inadequate or does not appropriately address course concepts.

This is a solid paper, which appropriately responds to and addresses the prompt. The author clearly
states a thesis/central idea, but may
have minor issues in developments.
Solid connections between major course concepts and specific examples are effectively utilized.
Attempts to define terms, not always
successfully.

This paper excels in responding to and appropriately addressing the prompt. The author demonstrates
nuanced thinking. The author's central
idea/thesis is clearly communicated;
and the author makes thoughtful connections between major course concepts and specific examples.
The author understands and critically evaluates
sources. Appropriately
defines and uses terms.

The organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
Paragraphs are disjointed and lack effective transition.

The structure of paragraphs is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement. Logical links not connected.

This paper shows a logical progression of ideas and uses fairly sophisticated
transitional sentences. e.g.
Some logical links may be faulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to the paper's central idea.

The author uses a logical structure appropriate
to paper's subject, purpose, audience,
thesis.
The author uses effective transitional sentences. The author effectively guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or
progression of ideas.

Paper lacks most elements of correct formatting.

Some formatting guidelines are followed.

Paper follows designated guidelines.
Most citations are correctly formatted.

Follows guidelines; citations in correct format.