Skip to main content

iRubric: Literature Research rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literature Research 
Research literature on the topic of family relationships and compare and contrast how various strategies help improve family relationships.
Rubric Code: ZX247W7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Literature Research
  Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Background information

Poor

- Content is not comprehensive <BR>
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR>
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR>
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Fair

- Content is accurate.<BR>
- Major points are stated.<BR>
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR>
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Good

Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.<BR>
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR>
- Responses are excellent and address assignment including course concepts.
Literature Review

Poor

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement.<BR>
Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.<BR>
-Less than 4 journal articles are reviewed<BR>
-Articles are not research based or peer-reviewed
Fair

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions are present.<BR>
- Conclusion is logical.<BR>
-Review of at least (4) journal articles.
Good

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.<BR>
Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.<BR>
Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.<BR>
All references are less than 5 years old.
Discussion

Poor

No implications given or discussed. Discussion irrevelant to topic. Only 1 reference cited.
Fair

Few implications discussed. Comparisons given but not discussed throughly.<BR>
There is discussion of actual treatment vs. best treatment as supported by literature but it is incomplete.<BR>
<BR>
Student does not point out how improvements may be made or support for current practice.
Good

There is a complete discussion of the actual treatment of the patient vs. best treatment as supported by the cited literature.<BR>
<BR>
*Student discusses if and how he/she would care for this patient differently based on these findings.<BR>
<BR>
*If the literature supports recommended treatment the student defends the current practice.
Format, Grammar, Punctuation & Spel

Poor

- Paper follows most guidelines.<BR>
-Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Fair

- Paper follows designated guidelines.<BR>
-Format is good.<BR>
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors.<BR>
Spelling is correct.
Good

- Paper follows all designated guidelines.<BR>
- Format enhances readability of paper.<BR>
-- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224