Skip to main content
iRubric: Nursing QI Paper rubric

iRubric: Nursing QI Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Nursing QI Paper 
Nursing 112 Paper
Objective: Gain an understanding of evidenced based practice in relation to The Quality Improvement Cycle and Benchmarking. Description: Using Concept 48: Quality Improvement in Pearson you are to write a paper concerning benchmarking and the Quality Improvement Cycle.
Rubric Code: XXA2C83
By DebLosicki
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor

4 pts

Below Average

6 pts

Average

8 pts

Exceptional

10 pts

Situation/ Outcome Discussion

Describe the situation/outcome and quality indicators (ANA or QSEN) that will be addressed
Poor

No clear introduction or first person used
Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or missing.
Questions were not adequately answered.
Below Average

-Introduction present but doesn't correlate to the content.
Content is not comprehensive
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Average

-Introduction is present correlates to content 3rd person discussion
Content is accurate.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Exceptional

Introduction clear concise directly related to content.
3rd person discussion.
-Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent and address assignment including course concepts.
Literature Review

Perform a literature search to provide evidence based practice data to support the change needed.
Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Lack conclusion
-There are (2) or more journal articles that are more than 5 years old. Online resources are not reliable or peer-reviewed.
Below Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement.
Conclusion i does not flow from the body of the paper.
-Less than 2 journal articles are reviewed but meet the 5 year requirement
-Articles are not research based or peer-reviewed
Average

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
-Review of at least (3) journal articles.
Articles used are 5 years or less.
Exceptional

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Review of at least (3) journal articles
All references are less than 5 years old.
Plan - Do- Study

Describe the use of the PDSA
Poor

Interventions are not related to the chosen topic.
No intext citations provided.
Medical interventions provided not nursing interventions.
Below Average

Interventions are incomplete or not appropriate for topic. Few intext citations provided.
Average

Identifies 1-2 specific nursing interventions for each outcome. Interventions are individualized to the client.
Interventions focus appropriately on the etiology of the nursing diagnosis and reflect how the nurse will assist the client in meeting the outcomes.
Exceptional

Identifies 3-4 or more specific interventions for each outcome. Interventions are clearly linked to outcomes and focus specifically on the etiology of the nursing diagnosis. Oucomes clearly reflect what the nurse will do to help the client meet the outcomes and are supported by citations.
Detailed plan and communication

Outline a detailed plan to implement the change and describe the communication needed to succeed
to with minimal resistance
Poor

Topic not discussed. No true nursing implications given. Discussion of actual vs. best treatment as supported by literature is weak and incomplete.
Below Average

No implications given or discussed. Discussion irrevelant to topic. Only 1 reference cited.
Average

Few implications discussed. Comparisons given but not discussed thoroughly.<BR>
<BR>
Student does not point out how improvements may be made or support for current practice.
Exceptional

There is a complete discussion of the Quality Improvement Cycle and Benchmarking as supported by the cited literature.<BR>
<BR>
*Student discusses nursing responsibility in Quality Improvement<BR>
<BR>
*Discusses the impact of both the Quality Improvement Cycle and Benchmarking in the cited works.
APA Format, Grammar, Punctuation &

Cite references using APA format. Include a reference page. Paper should be grammatically correct
Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.<BR>
- Paper is not double spaced<BR>
-No in text citation provided<BR>
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Below Average

- Paper follows most guidelines.<BR>
-Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Average

- Paper follows designated guidelines.<BR>
-Format is good.<BR>
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors.<BR>
Spelling is correct.
Exceptional

- Paper follows all designated guidelines.<BR>
- Format enhances readability of paper.<BR>
-- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Enter Title

Total
Poor
Below Average
Average
Exceptional






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16