iRubric: Writing Assignments Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Writing Assignments Rubric

Use this rubric for assessing writing skill unless otherwise noted.

Rubric Code: N743B5

By jaydewhurst

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion 100 %
	Poor 0 pts	Acceptable 70 pts	Exemplary 100 pts
Conceptual Understanding	Poor The article does not demonstrate that the author has an undergraduate-level knowledge, insight and understanding of the subject matter as it relates to music appreciation.	Acceptable The article demonstrates somewhat that the author has an undergraduate-level knowledge, insight and understanding of the subject matter as it relates to music appreciation, but lacks a clear demonstration.	Exemplary The article clearly demonstrates that the author has an undergraduate-level knowledge, insight and understanding of the subject matter as it relates to music appreciation.
Content & Development	Poor - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.	Acceptable - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive. - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. - Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Exemplary - Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. - Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Organization & Structure	Poor - Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. - Paragraph is disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Acceptable - Structure of the paragraph is not easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions need improvement.	Exemplary - Structure of the paragraph is clear and easy to follow.
Format APA/MLA etc.	Poor - Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting. - Paragrpah is inadequate/excessive in length.	Acceptable - Paper follows most guidelines. - Paper is over/ under word length.	Exemplary - Paper follows designated guidelines. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Mechanics	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.	Acceptable - Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Exemplary - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Critical Thinking	Poor The article does not demonstrate a clear and logical (inductive or deductive) progression of points and conclusions with evidence that the author understands and applies critical thinking, accurately interpreting evidence, statements, graphics, etc. and thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view (including cross-cultural insights), and constructs persuasive and compelling arguments drawing warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.	Acceptable The article demonstrates to some degree a clear and logical (inductive or deductive) progression of points and conclusions with evidence that the author understands and applies critical thinking, accurately interpreting evidence, statements, graphics, etc. and thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view (including cross-cultural insights), and constructs persuasive and compelling arguments drawing warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.	Exemplary The article demonstrates a clear and logical (inductive or deductive) progression of points and conclusions with evidence that the author understands and applies critical thinking, accurately interpreting evidence, statements, graphics, etc. and thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view (including cross-cultural insights), and constructs persuasive and compelling arguments drawing warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric