Skip to main content

iRubric: Weekly Response Papers (short) - Final rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Weekly Response Papers (short) - Final 
Used for short 2-5 page papers
Rubric Code: F7C739
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Unacceptable

0 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts


1.5 pts

Marginal

2 pts

Satisfactory

2 pts

Acceptable

3 pts


3.5 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Quality of Research
15 %

Unacceptable

Did not complete assignment.
Needs Improvement

Fails to cite 4 sources.

Fewer than 1 peer-reviewed journal article cited.

Source reliability is questionable.

Insufficient information provided to support thesis.
1.5 ( x 15 %)
Marginal

Fails to cite 4 sources.
Fails to cite 2 peer-reviewed
journals.
Source reliability is
questionable.
Information provided
supports some of the thesis.
Satisfactory

Fails to cite 4 sources.

Fails to cite 2 peer-reviewed journals.

Source reliability is questionable.

Information provided supports some of the thesis.
Acceptable

4 works cited (at least 2 are peer-reviewed journal articles).

Sources mostly reliable.

Sufficient information provided to support thesis.

Research of sufficient depth.
3.5 ( x 15 %)
Excellent

4 + works cited (at least 2 are peer-reviewed journal articles).

Sufficient information provided to support all elements of thesis.

Research in-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Content & Development
60 %

Unacceptable

Did not complete assignment.
Needs Improvement

Thesis is unclear or nonexistent. Or, support for thesis is insufficient.

Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.

Some facts inaccurate.
1.5 ( x 60 %)
Marginal

Content is not
comprehensive and /or
persuasive.
Major points are addressed,
but not well supported.
Research is inadequate or
does not address course
concepts.
Content is inconsistent with
regard to purpose and clarity
of thought.
Satisfactory
Acceptable

Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.

Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.

Research is adequate and timely.

Content and purpose of the writing are clear.

Interesting to read.
3.5 ( x 60 %)
Excellent

Support for thesis is complex, complete, and in-depth.

Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.

Very interesting to read.
Organization & Structure
20 %

Unacceptable

Did not complete assignment.
Needs Improvement

Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.

Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.

Paper does not develop in a logically consistent manner.
1.5 ( x 20 %)
Marginal

Structure of the paragraph is
not easy to follow.
Paragraph transitions need
improvement.
Some logical organization
present.
Satisfactory
Acceptable

Structure of the paragraph is mostly easy to follow.

Organization mostly transparent, logical, and helpful.

A pleasure to read.
3.5 ( x 20 %)
Excellent

Structure of the paragraph is clear and easy to follow.

Flow of ideas fluid and logical.

Organization transparent, logical, and helpful.

A pleasure to read.
Grammar & Mechanics
3 %

Unacceptable

Did not complete assignment.
Needs Improvement

Voice inconsistent and passive.

Ineffective word choice.

More than 5 spelling errors and/or errors in agreement. More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
1.5 ( x 3 %)
Marginal

Voice is somewhat passive.

Correct word choice.
Fewer than 5 spelling errors and/or errors in agreement.

Fewer than 3 punctuation or
capitalization errors.
Satisfactory
Acceptable

Voice is mostly active.

Correct word choice.

Fewer than 3 spelling errors and/or errors in agreement. No punctuation or capitalization errors.
3.5 ( x 3 %)
Excellent

Consistent, active, and appropriate voice.

Sophisticated and precise word choice.

No spelling errors.

No errors in agreement or tense. No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Works Cited & APA Style
2 %

Unacceptable

Did not complete assignment.
Needs Improvement

Sources not properly cited in paper and/or bibliography.

More than 10 errors in format or punctuation (in bibliography).

Cover page format does not meet APA criteria.
1.5 ( x 2 %)
Marginal

Not all sources properly cited
in both paper and
bibliography.
Fewer than 10 errors in
format and punctuation in
bibliography.
Cover page format does not
completely meet APA
criteria.
Satisfactory
Acceptable

All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.

Fewer than 5 errors in format and punctuation in bibliography.

Cover page format meets APA criteria.
3.5 ( x 2 %)
Excellent

All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.

Fewer than 3 errors in format and punctuation in bibliography.

Cover page format meets APA criteria.



Keywords:
  • Writing, short







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224