Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Treatment Plan rubric

iRubric: Treatment Plan rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Treatment Plan Treatment Plan Patient-centered treatment plan to address key findings from the biopsychosocial strengths-based assessment that includes patient diagnosis, high-priority treatment goals, measurable objectives, a timeline for treatment progress, recommendations for further evaluation and treatment Rubric Code: F2253AW By drrosrobertson Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate

Criterion
	Excellent/Good This treatment plan is evidence based and clear enough that it could be implemented by others. 20 pts	Good/Fair This treatment plan has all essential elements outlined but needs expansion of and clarity on major elements 17 pts	Fair/Poor Treatment plan does not address all the required components or is not adequately developed for implementation. 14 pts	Unsatisfactory Treatment is incomplete and diagnosis, goals and/or interventions inaccurate. 10 pts
Diagnosis 3 pts DSM-5	Excellent/Good Well supported Primary Diagnosis and if necessary Secondary Diagnosis. All codes under primary diagnosis are present and include social environmental issues specific to your client.	Good/Fair Provides primary diagnosis Misses the presence of multiple diagnoses or accepts previous diagnosis provided that appears inaccurate. Most names and codes correct.	Fair/Poor Misses one or more axes. Primary Diagnosis is incorrect or name and code is inaccurate. V codes for social environmental are not sufficiently accurate.	Unsatisfactory Only provides primary diagnosis. Proposed diagnosis does not match client data.
Objectives of Treatment 8 pts Goals and objectives Conceptualization of Client Diagnosis and symptoms. Client Readiness for Change,Client's expectations of treatment.	Excellent/Good Goals and objectives are appropriate to case conceptualization and diagnosis. Goals are feasible and sufficient to address the diagnosis. Client involvement in setting goals.	Good/Fair Goals and objectives are appropriate for type of client in general not clearly linked to a conceptualization of the client. Goals may be somewhat idealistic or insufficient to address the specific client diagnosis. Goals planned by student and supervisor.	Fair/Poor Goals and objectives are stated in unclear or very general manner. Limited conceptualization of the client such that goals not specific to this client but rather universal. Goals are unrealistic or insufficient to assist client. Goals were provided by the supervisor or staff.	Unsatisfactory Case conceptualization minimal, missing, or inaccurate. Goals and objectives are nonspecific and insufficient.
Assessments 2 pts Clinical interview summary Any formal and informal testing	Excellent/Good Evidence of a clear understanding of the client and the environmental context of the problems. Used or suggests relevant assessment measures	Good/Fair Evidence of an adequate understanding of the client and the environmental context. Does not discuss assessment measures.	Fair/Poor Incomplete assessment of client and/or environmental context. Does not discuss assessment measures	Unsatisfactory Very limited clinical interview with insufficient information about essential client and environmental factors.
Interventions 2 pts Specific evidence-based approaches and strategies to guide treatment.	Excellent/Good Interventions are appropriate and specific to the client at this time. Interventions are supported by empirical literature or professional literature.	Good/Fair Interventions are appropriate for the client diagnosis or counseling issues. Some of the interventions are supported by professional and empirical literature.	Fair/Poor Interventions are appropriate for clients with this diagnosis and age in general. Many of the interventions are insufficiently and/or inaccurately described. Relies on the textbook for interventions.	Unsatisfactory Interventions not sufficiently developed or inappropriate for the client. No empirical support provided for the interventions
Nature and Focus of Treatment 2 pts Psychiatric Care Frequency of appointments	Excellent/Good Selects the appropriate amount of structure and direction. Selects an effective mode of treatment. Selects appropriate frequency of treatment.	Good/Fair Selects two of the three aspects of nature and focus in treament appropriate to the client.	Fair/Poor Incomplete discussion of the nature and focus of treatment and/or inappropriate selection of two of the three aspects/	Unsatisfactory Does not address the nature and focus of treatment.
Adjunctive Therapy 2 pts Therapy (Individual, Group, Family) Psychological testing Support Groups Community Resources Psychoeducation	Excellent/Good Selects additional approaches to manage the environmental aspects of the case. These are specific to appropriate community resources.	Good/Fair Selects additional approaches to manage the environmental aspects of the case. Does not give specifics about the resources.	Fair/Poor Alludes to resources in a very general way, such as "social support group"or "psychoeducational group" without any consideration of client specifics.	Unsatisfactory Does not address any adjunctive therapies as part of the plan.
Prognosis 1 pts nature and severity of the problems client's motivation for change.	Excellent/Good Uses empirical literature and client history and motivational level to formulate a prognosis.	Good/Fair General prognosis for client's age, gender, and diagnosis. Uses client history or motivational level or empirical literature to formulate a prognosis for this client	Fair/Poor General prognosis for client's age, gender, and diagnosis. Not particular to client's history, motivation, and empirical literature.	Unsatisfactory Inaccurate or vague prognosis unsupported by data and empirical literature
Patient Resources 1 pts Awareness of patient, family, and community strengths and resources.	Excellent/Good Plan includes all resources, strengths and needs in regard to patient, family, and community.	Good/Fair Plan includes some resources, strengths, and needs in regard to patient, family, and community.	Fair/Poor Plan does not include enough evidence of strengths and needs in regards to patient, family and community.	Unsatisfactory Plan does not include any evidence of strengths and needs in regards to patient, family, and community.
Overall Plan 2 pts Completeness of plan to create change for patient.	Excellent/Good Demonstrates understanding of patient needs and applies appropriately. Plan clearly in accordance with practice setting and professional care. Demonstrates clear understanding of benefits of treatment.	Good/Fair Demonstrates some understanding of patient needs and applies somewhat appropriately. Plan is somewhat clear in accordance with practice setting and professional care.	Fair/Poor Some problems with demonstration of patient needs. Goals/interventions often not consistent with needs. Minor problems in clarification of need for treatment.	Unsatisfactory Inconsistent and lacks demonstration of patient needs, goals and interventions unclear or not included. No clarification of need for and benefits of treatment.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Accounting rubrics

More Exam rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16