iRubric: the teosinte hypothesis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

the teosinte hypothesis

module 3 assignment

In this assignment, you will answer the questions on the handout given to you.

Rubric Code: E23WB29

By mderby1

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion 100 %
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Content & Development 65 pts	Poor - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear. Questions were not adequately answered. -Punnett Square not completed	Fair - Content is not comprehensive.. - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. -Punnett square partially completed and few correct answers	Good - Content is accurate. - Responses are adequate and address assignment. -Punnett square completed and half answers correct	Excellent - Content is comprehensive and clear. - Meaningful thought/effort put into answering personalized questions - Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts. -Punnett square completed and correct
Organization & Structure 10 pts	Poor - Organization and structure detract from the answer	Fair - Structure of the answers is not easy to follow.	Good - Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.	Excellent Structure is clear and easy to follow.
Format 10 pts	Poor - Assignment is disorganized and hard to follow/understand.	Fair - Assignment is mostly organized but is lacking clear structure.	Good - Assignment follows designated guidelines. -Format is good.	Excellent - Assignment follows all designated guidelines. -Format enhances readability
Presentation 10 pts	Poor Unorganized, leaves out important information	Fair Slightly unorganized, missing important aspects of presentation	Good Organized, has most of the required information and is presented clearly	Excellent Has all of the required information,very organized, and is presented in a professional manner.
Mechanics 5 pts	Poor There are numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication.	Fair Includes some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader	Good largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication.	Excellent free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.