iRubric: Evidenced Based Group Planning Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Evidenced Based Group Planning Paper

Objective: Gain an understanding of evidenced based practice in relation to small group planning. Description: The paper MUST be written from a SOCIAL WORK perspective. Describe the background of the problem and dedmonstrate an evidenced-based social skills group with children between the ages of 6 - 8 years old.

Rubric Code: AXB8379

By Enedina01

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Poor 5 pts	Below Average 10 pts	Average 15 pts	Exceptional 20 pts
Background information	Poor - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear and /or missing in the research. Interventnions were not adequately answered.	Below Average - Content is not comprehensive - Major points are addressed, but not well supported in the research. Interventions are inadequate or do not address the quantity or quality of engaging members in the group. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Average - Content is accurate.<BR> - Major points are stated in the research. - ResponsesInterventions are adequate and address assignment the quantity and quality of engaging members of the group. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear.	Exceptional Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported in the research - Interventions are excellent and demonstrates the quantity and quality of engaging the members in the group. Content and purpose are exceptionally clear.
Literature Review	Poor - Organization and structure detract from the message. - Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts. -There are (2) or more journal articles that are more than 5 years old. Online resources are not reliable or peer-reviewed.	Below Average - Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement. Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper. -Less than 3 journal or scholary sources are reviewed -Articles are not research based or peer-reviewed	Average - Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions are present. - Conclusion is logical. -Review of at least (3) journal articles.	Exceptional -Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper. Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper. Review of 4 or more scholarly or journal articles were used.
Plan of Care	Poor Interventions are not related to the chosen topic. No intext citations provided. Interventions provided not from non-reliable sources.	Below Average Interventions are incomplete or not appropriate for topic. Few intext citations provided.	Average Identifies 1-2 specific evidenced-based interventions for each outcome. Interventions are group focused. Interventions are age appropriate and reflect how the social worker will assist the group in meeting the outcomes.	Exceptional Identifies 3-4 or more specific interventions for each outcome. Interventions are clearly linked to outcomes, age appropriate and focus specifically on evidenced-based research. Oucomes clearly reflect what the social worker will do to help the group members meet the outcomes and are supported by citations.
Feedback/Problem-Solving	Poor Very poor description of strengths and weaknesses. No demonstration of evidenced-based modification and are not age appropriate.	Below Average An attempt to illustrate strengths and weaknesses is made but poorly described. Modifications are not clear and not age appropriate	Average Illustrates some strengths and weakness. Modifications are clear and age appropriate.	Exceptional Exceptionally illustrates strengths and weakness that may be evident observing children practice the skill. Modifications are clear, age appropriate and cites a source demonstrating evidenced-based changes.
APA Format, Grammar, Punctuation &	Poor - Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting. -No in text citation provided - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.	Below Average - Paper follows most guidelines. -Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Average - Paper follows designated guidelines. -Format is good. - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct.	Exceptional - Paper follows all designated guidelines. - Format enhances readability of paper. -- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

Keywords:

Evidenced-based, social skills, children, inteventions

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric