Skip to main content
iRubric: RÚBRICA PRESENTACIÓN rubric

iRubric: RÚBRICA PRESENTACIÓN rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
RÚBRICA PRESENTACIÓN 
Use this rubric for grading student papers. Can be customized for any subject.
Rubric Code: A2XXB48
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Journalism  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate, Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor

D

60 pts

Fair

C

70 pts

Good

B

80 pts

Exceeds

A

90 pts

Content & Development

Poor

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
Fair

- Content does not include context, is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported by simulation data.
- Research of simulation data is inadequate or does not address simulation concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good

- Content includes appropriate context, is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported by simulation data.
- Research of simulation data is adequate.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Exceeds

In addition to "Good" criteria...
-Information is creative, clear and concise.
- Information added above what was suggested in instructions.
- Research of simulation data is exhaustive.
-Analysis and conclusions includes novel insights, strategies, and understanding of the simulation .
Organization & Structure

Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Introduction and/or conclusion is missing.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Fair

- Structure of the report is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusions and claims are missing, or if provided, does not flow from the rest of the paper.
Good

- Structure of the report is somewhat clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present and logical but need a few adjustments to maintain the flow of thought throughout the report.
- Conclusions and claims are logical and need a few minor adjustments to improve flow from the rest of the report.
Exceeds

- Structure of the report is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the report.
- Conclusions and claims are logical and flows from the rest of the report.
Format

Poor

- Report lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Data and context are not provided.
- Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.
Fair

- Report follows many guidelines.
- Report provides data, but they are incorrectly prepared.
- Paper provides context, with some errors or omissions.
- Paper is over/ under word length.
Good

- Report follows most guidelines.
- Data and context are used appropriately with few minor errors.
- Report is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Exceeds

- Report follows designated guidelines.
- Data and context are used appropriately.
- Report is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling

Poor

- Report contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or superlatives, or conversational tone.
Fair

- Report contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors (no more than 5 errors total).
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon, or superlatives, or conversational tone.
Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with no more than 2 errors; spelling is correct with no more than 1.
- Language is clear and but not precise; sentences are a little varied in structure.
Exceeds

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Observations

Poor

-Paper is lacking in most observational descriptions
Fair

- Paper is missing some observation criteria or information
-Paper is lacking insight into the behaviors or abilities of individual
Good

- Paper includes all major points of observation criteria
-Necessary information is mostly presented but could be more well-developed or insightful
Exceeds

- Paper follows designated paper criteria including a profile of the individual, observation process,identification of behaviors or abilities
-All points are well-developed, include a depth of information expected of writing in higher education










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16