iRubric: Art History Research Project rubric

- All art is fully identified in a natural and flowing manner.
- Images are provided where appropriate, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion brings the argument back to the claim in a meaningful way.

- Most art is identified well, style may be distracting.
- Images are provided for the primary subject, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion summarizes the claim.

- Art identification is an issue that detracts from the paper.
- Images provided are unlabeled or not mentioned in the text.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts
- The paper show some consideration for how it ends.

- Art is unidentified to the extent that the which works being discussed becomes unclear.
- Images are not provided or are relevant.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are arbitrary, and lack clear thought.
- No conclusion present.

- Paper follows Chicago format and uses footnotes.
- Paper fulfills length requirements
- Font and spacing fulfills requirements

- Paper Mostly follows Chicago format and uses footnotes.
- Paper is at least a page over or under required length.
- Font or Spacing is moderately incorrect.

- Paper follows a citation style with multiple errors.
- Paper length is inadequate or excessive in a way that distracts from the assignment.
- Numerous formatting issues

- Citations are not used in a meaningful way.
- Paper Length highly effects the usefulness of the assignment.
- Excessive formatting issues