Skip to main content
iRubric: Contemporary Artist Research Project rubric

iRubric: Contemporary Artist Research Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Contemporary Artist Research Project 
Rubric for grading Contemporary Artist Presentation
Rubric Code: JX5WC44
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criteria
  Good

10-7 points

(N/A)

Average

6-4 points

(N/A)

Poor

3-0 points

(N/A)

Content & Organization
50 %
1
10 pts

All key elements of the assignments are covered.
Is the group thesis well presented and supported? Is the presentation an appropriate length?

Good

Thesis is clear and well stated. Presentation is easy to understand and fills an appropriate amount of time.
Average

Thesis is clear but examples do not clearly support the group's argument.
Presentation seemed a little on the short side
Poor

Thesis is not clear. Examples do not clearly connect to the group's topic.
Presentation significantly short or long (rambling). Instructor had to stop the group.
2
10 pts

The content is comprehensive, and accurate.

Good

The group presents sufficient information and research to create a compelling analysis. Important historical facts or formal details are noted when necessary.
Average

The group presents both historical information and formal details, but did not provide an accurate analysis.
Poor

The group presentation lacks significant historical information which supports the thesis/analysis.
4
10 pts

Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.

Good

The presentation is easy to follow and examples are clear.
Average

The presentation is easy to follow and examples are clear. There may be a few places where connections are unclear.
Poor

The presentation is difficult to understand or has no flow.
5
10 pts

The group introduces the material clearly and provides a logical conclusion

Good

The presentation is clear and logical.
Average

The presentation is mostly easy to follow, but there are a few places that are confusing.
Poor

The presentation is unclear and the thesis is not clearly stated.
6
10 pts

Text and Images

Good

Text and content is purposely design for the presentation, communicates concepts clearly, and enhances the quality of the presentation. Student's graphics/ images are the primary means of presentation and text is accurate and relevant to images (not overly wordy and unnecessary).
Average

Text and content is copy-pasted from other material but edited for length or readability. Student uses graphics/ images to relate to text and presentation.
Poor

Text and content is copy-pasted from other material with little or no editing. Text has poor readability quality.Graphics/ images used are unnecessary or do not support or relate to the text and presentation.
7
10 pts

Analysis of the artwork

Good

Excellent and detailed description and analysis of the required pieces and other work of the artist. Makes insightful comparisons and thoughtful analysis of what the work means. Connects the style of the art to the reasons it has been made and why.
Average

Adequate description and analysis of the required pieces - in terms of context, content and style.
Poor

Includes minimal description and analysis of the artwork. Little or no comparison to other artwork. (Doesn't "get it". Doesn't "understand the work").
8
15 pts

Intersectionality Content

Good

Excellent and well explained connection to the importance, in terms of diversity and perspective, about this artists' work. Makes insightful observations about the perceived cultural value of this individual not only to the art world, but to humanity. Emphasizes diverse and global perspective of their work.
Average

Adequate understanding and analysis of the perceived cultural value of the artists' work. Touched on, but not fully explained.
Poor

Included minimal description about how this artist affects our perspectives and about the impact they have had on breaking down barriers of cultural exclusion dominant in some areas of art.
Mechanics and Format
15 %
1
5 pts

Power Point transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the presentation.

Good

Transitions make sense. Power Point works correctly.
Average

Transitions make sense. Power Point works with few errors.
Poor

Transitions are unclear and Power Point does not function properly.
3
5 pts

Statements are complete, clear and concise. Images are analyzed and described.

Good

Statements are clear. Image analysis is easy to understand.
Average

Statements are clear, but analysis is difficult to follow.
Poor

Statements and analysis are unclear.
5
5 pts

Spelling and grammar are correct. Citations are included.

Good

Correct
Average

Some Errors
Poor

Several Errors. Citations not included.
Presentation
35 % Is the student professional in presentation of the report and execution of delivery?
1. Delivery
10 pts

Students are clear and well-spoken during presentation

Good

Yes.
Average

Some problems.
Poor

No.
3. Mastery of Research Conducted
10 pts

Student shows confidence and mastery of topic researched during entire presentation.

Good

Yes.
Average

Some problems.
Poor

No.
4. Organization
10 pts

Presentation of report flowed with ease due to proper preparation and rehearsal.

Good

Yes.
Average

Some problems.
Poor

No.



Keywords:
  • Power Point Presentation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16