iRubric: Writing Assignments for Hospitality students - v3 rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Writing Assignments for Hospitality students - v3

Writing Assignments

This rubric is to be used when assessing INDIVIDUAL assignments for undergrad/diploma level students

Rubric Code: X3BAA2

By cwittke

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Criterion %
	Poor None/very little Missing parts Flawed rationale Lacks logic 1 pts	Fair Some attempts show progress Logical in some parts Rationale is accurate in some parts 2 pts	Good Most or All/Follows what was taught in class 3 pts	Excellent All/Above and Beyond/Original thinking 4 pts
Hotel Group/Chain for Business % Hotel Group selected does work with groups - website has special group/meeting section, special staff etc Out of /10	Poor Students do not refer to the business side of the selected brand - too much focus on FIT or generic content	Fair	Good Brand selected has many areas that show evidence of Group Business - set meeting space, group menus, staff who are specially trained to work in groups	Excellent Student group "acts as one" - they are a group of sales or other representatives and have a unified approach - rehearsed and aware of each other's content
Content & Development - thoroughnes % This refers to the the thoroughness of included information in the assignment as required by the outline. /20	Poor - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear and /or missing and/ or persuasive.	Fair - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive. - Some Major points are addressed, but not well supported. - Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Good - Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. - Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear.	Excellent Business Agenda and Group Profile are taken into account through all phases and there is customized content.
Required Responses - Depth % This refers to how comprehensive the student(s) responses are to all questions. /20	Poor Missing some answers to questions OR very little detail or original thinking shown. Most information is flawed or incorrect.	Fair Some questions are answered - but there are many areas lacking any depth of detail or showing thinking - responses do not show any original thinking or ideas and student does not follow process/information taught in class.	Good Some questions are answered - but there are areas lacking any depth of thinking - responses may not show original thinking or ideas and student sometimes follows process/information taught in class.	Excellent All questions are answered - in depth and thoughtful/reflective - appliation of learning from within the classroom is expanded and uses some original thinking
Accuracy of answers % This refers to the five main questions /40	Poor Location/venue is not mentioned or does not make sense based on the content of the assignment and program/attendee profile Not done/included Format difficult to uNot included or not a realistic choice understand	Fair Location/Venue may work but not best choice Format included but is flawed Included but some errors or flaws in recommendation - seems to be generic/not customized to demographic and group	Good	Excellent Application of program learning Answers show creativity and customization - recognizes demographics venue and menu will work realistic and best choice for activity for time allocated and audience
Organization & Structure % This refers to the overall paper and how it "flows" /10	Poor - Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. - Introduction and/or conclusion is missing. - Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Fair - Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. - Introduction is missing or, if provided, does not preview major points. - Paragraph transitions need improvement. - Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.	Good	Excellent - Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow (layout and design) - Introduction provides clear background on the topic and previews major points. - Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper. - Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Format, grammar, punctuation % This refers to the overall professionalism and attention to details. /10	Poor - Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting. - Citations and references are not provided. - Paper is inadequate/excessive in length. - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.	Fair - Paper follows most guidelines. - Paper provides citations, but they are incorrectly prepared. - Paper provides reference list, with some errors or omissions. - Paper is over/ under word length. Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Good - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. Some application of terminology	Excellent - Paper follows designated guidelines. - Citations and references are used appropriately. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment. Correct appliation of industry terminology through-out paper.
Overall Impression % This refers to the over-all "first impression" of the professionalism and quality of the assignment submitted	Poor Appears to be a lack of attention to detail, time spent. care/quality	Fair Some errors but overall good effort shown	Good	Excellent Attention to details shows and content reflects weight of assignment

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric