iRubric: Statistics-Hypothesis Testing rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Statistics-Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis Testing with Reporting Writing - Stepped Procedure: Excel & Word using MegaStat

Rubric Code: U32532

By patwalsh

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: Exam

Grade Levels: (none)

Criterion Quantitative Qualitative
	Poor Quantitative Qualitative 1 pts	Fair-Good Quantitative Qualitative 2 pts	Very Good-Excellent Quantitative Qualitative 3 pts
Content & Development 50 % Statistical Affirmation	Poor - Content is incomplete / vague. - Major points are not all addressed or clear.	Fair-Good - All Key Points & content not comprehensive and /or addressed. - Major Points are addressed, but not well supported or explained. - Research is sparse / inadequate or does not address key concepts. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Very Good-Excellent - Content is comprehensive, accurate. - All Key Points are addressed and are well covered. - Research is adequate and timely. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear. -Interesting to read.
Organization & Structure 20 % Hypothesis testing MegaStat	Poor - Organization and structure detract from the Hypotheses of the writer. - Steped Procedures are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Fair-Good - Structure of the Hypotheses is not easy to follow. - Hypotheses Stepped transitions need improvement.	Very Good-Excellent - Structure of the Hypotheses is clear and easy to follow. -Flow of ideas fluid and logical. -Clear to read and follow.
Descriptive Stats & Frequency Distr 10 % Excel Worksheet MegaStat	Poor -Frequent errors.	Fair-Good -Occasional faults.	Very Good-Excellent -Very few or no faults with respect.
Qualitative Report 20 % Microsoft Word	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical errors. -Meaning blocked as text dominated by errors. -Range of vocabulary extremely limited. -English interference frequent.	Fair-Good - Paper contains few grammatical errors. - Language lacks clarity at times. -Vocabulary accurate but may be somewhat limited. -Some areas of English interference may be present but meaning rarely obscured.	Very Good-Excellent Wide range of structures with few or no significant errors. - Rules of grammar and vocabulary usage followed. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. -Little or no evidence of English interference.