iRubric: South American Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

South American Project

This is a skills building formative assessment. We will work on work attitude, develop skills in research using the internet, focus on a country and its history and culture. You will a PPT answering all prompts to give a glimpse into the richness of the country researched.

Rubric Code: RXX93A6

By nprieto

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Category
	SUPERIOR (10 pts) (N/A)	EXCELLENT (9 pts) (N/A)	GOOD (7 pts) (N/A)	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) (N/A)
Originality	SUPERIOR (10 pts) Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting manner.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting manner.	GOOD (7 pts) Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on a few slides.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) Presentation shows very little attempt at original thought.
Effectiveness	SUPERIOR (10 pts) Presentation includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic by answering all the prompts assigned. It is a highly effective study guide.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Presentation includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic by answering all but one of the prompts assigned. It is an adequate study guide.	GOOD (7 pts) Presentation is missing more than two key topics from the prompts assigned. It would make an incomplete study guide.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) Presentation is missing several key topic prompts and contains inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
Sequencing of information	SUPERIOR (10 pts) Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next slide.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One or two things seem out of place.	GOOD (7 pts) Some information is logically sequenced. There are sections where the information is not clear and concise.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
Content Accuracy	SUPERIOR (10 pts) All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.	GOOD (7 pts) The content is generally accurate, but some pieces of information are clearly flawed or inaccurate.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
Requirements	SUPERIOR (10 pts) All requirements are met and exceeded.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) All requirements are met.	GOOD (7 pts) One requirement was not completely met.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) More than one requirement was not completely met.
Use of graphics	SUPERIOR (10 pts) All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the presentation by giving the audience a visual of the country.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation - giving the audience some visual of the country .	GOOD (7 pts) All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation - giving the audience a limited visual of the country .	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) Several graphics are unattractive or there are none represented in the presentation - giving poor or no visual to the audience.
Organization	SUPERIOR (10 pts) Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Uses headings and bulleted lists are organized, but the overall organization of the topic appears flawed.	GOOD (7 pts) Content is logically organized for the most part but lacks headings or bullet points.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) There was no clear nor logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
Sources	SUPERIOR (10 pts) Source information for all facts, videos and images are provided using the MLA style.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Source information provided for all facts, videos and images are mostly in the MLA format.	GOOD (7 pts) Source information provided for all facts, videos and images are not in the MLA format.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) Very little or no source information provided.
Execution	SUPERIOR (10 pts) Presenters worked together during the entire presentation and shared the responsibility of the presentation by taking turns introducing material. They were all fully prepared and kept good eye contact and flow - only glancing at the slides for redirection.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Presenters mostly worked together during the presentation and shared the responsibility of the presentation by taking turns introducing material though not having equal speaking time. Almost all were fully prepared and kept good eye contact and flow - only glancing at the slides for redirection.	GOOD (7 pts) Though presenters worked together during the presentation and shared some of the responsibility of the presentation by taking turns introducing material, it was clear that the group was not prepared as the entire presentation was read. There was no eye contact with the audience.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) Presenters were not prepared to present, were not able to answer questions regarding their topic.
Bibliography/Citations	SUPERIOR (10 pts) All material was appropriately cited, and bibliography was completed using MLA style.	EXCELLENT (9 pts) Most of the material was appropriately cited - citations may have been in the comments section of the PPT, and bibliography was completed using MLA style.	GOOD (7 pts) Some of the material was incorrectly cited - citations may have been in the comments section of the PPT and it may have been unclear what material was being cited, and bibliography was completed using MLA style.	FAIR/POOR (5-6 pts) There was evidence of plagiarism on the PPT despite having been advised to correct this by teacher. This act invalidates your work, and you receive a ZERO grade for this project.

Keywords:

Latin America, culture, geography, formative assessment

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric