iRubric: BA366 Project #2 Leader Interview rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

BA366 Project #2 Leader Interview

This rubric is for grading student's written assignment in BA366 Organizational Behavior at Pepperdine University. Prof Alan E. Nelson, Ed.D.

Rubric Code: QX386A7

By aenelson

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Strong Growth Opportunities (N/A)	Room for Improvement (N/A)	Strong (N/A)	Very Strong (N/A)
Writing 20 % Grammar, syntax, word choice, high impact writing, and punctuation	Strong Growth Opportunities Rough high school quality writing; not taking advantage of previous writing feedback	Room for Improvement High school quality writing, with some improvement from previous, but still numerous rough spots	Strong Overall good undergrad level writing with some minor improvement items noted	Very Strong Quality upper class college writing with only a few minor improvement items noted
Content 40 % Student obviously selected an experienced leader and mined quality wisdom from the interview	Strong Growth Opportunities Disjointed; the content jumped around, lacked either a good subject or interview questions or both; failed to format the paper in a manner that was readable/logical	Room for Improvement Some good points and other weak points, related either to the quality of leader selected or interview questions; inconsistent quality	Strong Overall strong and succinct wisdom provided; strong leader selection; did well gathering insights from the leader; good flow of paper; provided key quotes and ideas	Very Strong Same qualities as the "Strong" criteria but also gives us the heart of the leader, offering a personal side of leading, not just head stuff
Synthesis 30 % Provided a summary of best lessons learned from the interview and integrated them with text/class content	Strong Growth Opportunities Seemed to only provide content related to the interview questions; failed to synthesize key lessons learned	Room for Improvement Synthesis seemed brief and not necessarily related to the interview or at least didn't provide much more than common knowledge	Strong Strong synthesis of what was learned from the leader and how it applies to us as college students; a few great quotes and ah-ha's; included 1-3 text references with citations	Very Strong Same qualities as the "Strong" criteria, but included 4-6 text/class references for a more robust analysis of the leader (properly cited)
Presentation 10 % The 3-minute mini-presentation was clear, well organized and succinct; well-balanced slides	Strong Growth Opportunities Class presentation seemed disjointed; not a strong sense of preparation	Room for Improvement Good verbal presentation; no visuals; some lack of clarity in the minds of the listeners; ran overtime	Strong Clear and succinct; provided appropriate visuals; audience "got it;" stayed within time limits; good speaking dynamics (see score sheet)	Very Strong Qualities of "Strong" criteria with a polished presentation; PPt slides were balanced and formatted for clarity

Keywords:

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric