iRubric: Peer-Reviewed Study Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Peer-Reviewed Study Rubric

This Peer-Reviewed Study will allow you to explore and relate a professional business article to our textbook and use the process of Critical Thinking (i.e., provide evidence for your main point) to derive the author’s main point.

Rubric Code: N2528A7

By Yuwari_Loyd

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Grading Criteria Total Points 100
	Accomplished (25-17) (N/A)	Proficient (16-9) (N/A)	Less than Proficient (8-1) (N/A)	Not Proficient (0) (N/A)
Summary Section	Accomplished (25-17) - Student meets all criteria found in the Article Review Instructions form. - Some examples include summarize and paraphrase chosen article. - Article is not over 12 months old.	Proficient (16-9) Student makes a strong effort to meet the requirements found in the Article Review Instructions form.	Less than Proficient (8-1) Student makes somewhat of an effort to meet the requirements found in the Article Review Instructions form.	Not Proficient (0) Unacceptable level of effort made to meet the requirements found in the Article Review Instructions form.
Critique Section	Accomplished (25-17) - Student did a thorough job explaining whether they agree or disagree with the author and provides evidence to support their opinion. - Student includes inductive and deductive examples that show mastery in understanding these concepts. Page length requirement is met.	Proficient (16-9) - Student did a thorough job explaining whether they agree or disagree with the author and provides evidence to support their opinion. - Student does not demonstrate a level of mastery for inductive and deductive reasoning but an attempt was made.	Less than Proficient (8-1) - Student explained whether they agree or disagree with the author and provides evidence (why or why not) to support their opinion. - Student does not include inductive or deductive examples from the article.	Not Proficient (0) Unacceptable level of effort to critique the article or provide inductive and deductive
Tie-In Section	Accomplished (25-17) Student was able to tie-in concepts from the text and make a connection to their chosen article. Page length requirement is met.	Proficient (16-9) Student made a proficient attempt to tie-in concepts from the text and make a connection to their chosen article. - Student makes an effort to cite and is on the right track but has areas in their paper where information is not properly credited to the author.	Less than Proficient (8-1) - Student has made an acceptable attempt to tie-in concepts from the text and make a connection to their chosen article.	Not Proficient (0) Unacceptable level of effort to connect information from the textbook to the article.
Formatting and Citations	Accomplished (25-17) - Meet minimum page length requirement of 3 pages (double-spaced). - Rules of APA, paper is free of grammatical and spelling errors. - ONE reference article only	Proficient (16-9) Followed the formatting guidelines per the Article Review Instructions document.	Less than Proficient (8-1) Student has not made an adequate attempt to properly cite according to a standard format or student has not made an adequate attempt to follow the formatting guidelines	Not Proficient (0) Has not met standards for citing or formatting.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric