Skip to main content
iRubric: Evidence Papers rubric

iRubric: Evidence Papers rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evidence Papers 
Evidence Papers
Objective: Gain an understanding of evidenced based practice in relation to patient safety and quality improvements. Description:Each group will select a specific area of perfusion practice covered during the quarter. Your presentation should describe the background of the problem, compare and contrast the evidenced from the literature and expert sources. Refer to the following rubric for grading guidelines.
Rubric Code: LX76B69
By Mindy1
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor

5 pts

Below Average

10 pts

Average

15 pts

Exceptional

20 pts

Background information

Poor

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or missing.
Questions were not adequately answered.
Below Average

- Content is not comprehensive
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Average

- Content is accurate.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Exceptional

Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent and address assignment including course concepts.
Literature Review

Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
-There are (3) or more journal articles that are more than 5 years old. Online resources are not reliable or peer-reviewed.
Below Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement.
Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
-Less than 4 journal articles are reviewed<BR>
-Articles are not research based or peer-reviewed
Average

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
-Review of at least (4) journal articles.
Exceptional

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
All references are less than 5 years old.
Plan of Care

Poor

Interventions are not related to the chosen topic. No intext citations provided.
Medical interventions provided not perfusion interventions.
Below Average

Interventions are incomplete or not appropriate for topic. Few intext citations provided.
Average

Identifies 1-2 specific perfusion interventions for each outcome. Interventions are individualized to the patient.
Exceptional

Identifies 3-4 or more specific interventions for each outcome. Interventions are clearly linked to outcomes and focus specifically on the etiology of diagnosis. .
Discussion

Poor

Topic not discussed. No true perfusion implications given. Discussion of actual vs. best treatment as supported by literature is weak and incomplete
There is no clear explanation of whether or not the patient's treatment agrees with literature and there are no additional recommendations or references cited.
Below Average

No implications given or discussed. Discussion irrevelant to topic. Only 1 reference cited.
Average

Few implications discussed. Comparisons given but not discussed throughly.
There is discussion of actual treatment vs. best treatment as supported by literature but it is incomplete.<BR>
<BR>
Student does not point out how improvements may be made or support for current practice.
Exceptional

There is a complete discussion of the actual treatment of the patient vs. best treatment as supported by the cited literature.
*Students discuss if and how he/she would care for this patient differently based on these findings.

*If the literature supports recommended treatment the student defends the current practice.
JECT Format, Grammar, Punctuation &

Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Paper is not double spaced
-No in text citation provided
- Presentation contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Below Average

- Presentation follows most guidelines.
-Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Average

- presentation follows designated guidelines.
-Format is good.
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors.
Spelling is correct.
Exceptional

- Paper follows all designated guidelines.
- Format enhances readability of paper.
-- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.



Keywords:
  • Pathophysiology of CPB Techniques



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98