iRubric: Writing Assignments for Event Management rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Writing Assignments for Event Management

This rubric is to be used when assessing assignments for undergrad/diploma level students

Rubric Code: LX34XB8

By kyliemcarlson

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Criterion %
	Does Not Meet Requirements None/very little Missing parts Flawed rationale Lacks logic Flaws will negatively impact execution - will not work as written 1 pts	Somewhat Meets Requirements Some attempts show progress Logical in some parts Rationale is accurate in some parts Flaws on execution as this is written 2 pts	Meets Requirements Most or All/Follows what was taught in class/May have flaws on execution Very little original thinking but classroom learning is applied with accuracy 3 pts	Exceeds Requirements/Exceptional!! All/Above and Beyond/Original thinking/Advanced application/Will work as shown 4 pts
Content & Development - thoroughnes % This refers to the the thoroughness of information in the assignment as required by the outline. /10	Does Not Meet Requirements - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear and /or missing and/ or persuasive.	Somewhat Meets Requirements - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive. - Some Major points are addressed, but not well supported. - Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meets Requirements Delivers what was asked for - no more and no less. Complete reponses/areas/sections.	Exceeds Requirements/Exceptional!! - Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. - Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Required Responses - Depth % This refers to how comprehensive the student(s) responses are to all questions. /20	Does Not Meet Requirements Missing some answers to questions OR very little detail or original thinking shown. Most information is flawed or incorrect.	Somewhat Meets Requirements Some questions are answered - but there are many areas lacking any depth of detail or showing thinking - responses do not show any original thinking or ideas and student does not follow process/information taught in class.	Meets Requirements Some questions are answered - but there are areas lacking any depth of thinking - responses may not show original thinking or ideas and student sometimes follows process/information taught in class.	Exceeds Requirements/Exceptional!! All questions are answered - in depth and thoughtful/reflective - appliation of learning from within the classroom is expanded and uses some original thinking
Accuracy of answers % This refers to the main areas to be covered /50	Does Not Meet Requirements Assignment criteria is not mentioned or does not make sense based on the content of the outline and requirements of the assignment Not done/included Format difficult to uNot included or not a realistic choice understand	Somewhat Meets Requirements Ideas may work but not best choice/plan Format included but is flawed Some errors or flaws in recommendation - seems to be generic/not customized to demographic and group	Meets Requirements Flow of event Load in/Load out planned for Event plan and execution details make sense for scenario/event Venue requirements not considered in full Demographics not considered in full Uses some creativity	Exceeds Requirements/Exceptional!! Advanced Application of program learning Answers show creativity and customization - recognizes outline/scenario and expands on requirements Original logical execution of plan
Organization & Structure % This refers to the overall paper and how it "flows" /15	Does Not Meet Requirements - Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. - Introduction and/or conclusion is missing. - Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Somewhat Meets Requirements - Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. - Introduction is missing or, if provided, does not preview major points. - Paragraph transitions need improvement. - Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.	Meets Requirements - Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow (layout and design follows required format but is not tailored/customized for the event) - easy to follow logic and explanation of event	Exceeds Requirements/Exceptional!! - Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow (layout and design has been customized for the event) - Introduction provides clear background on the topic and previews major points. - Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
Format, grammar, punctuation % This refers to the overall professionalism, following requirements for paper format. /5	Does Not Meet Requirements - Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting. - Citations and references are not provided. - Paper is inadequate/excessive in length. - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.	Somewhat Meets Requirements - Paper follows most guidelines. - Paper provides citations, but they are incorrectly prepared. - Paper provides reference list, with some errors or omissions. - Paper is over/ under word length. Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Meets Requirements - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. Some application of terminology	Exceeds Requirements/Exceptional!! - Paper follows designated guidelines. - Citations and references are used appropriately. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment. Correct appliation of industry terminology through-out paper. Language is consistent and strong through the paper - Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Overall Impression % This refers to the over-all "first impression" of the professionalism and quality of the assignment submitted	Does Not Meet Requirements Appears to be a lack of attention to detail, time spent. care/quality Some parts are missing Errors could have been caught if work was proof-read (careless errors) "no comment"	Somewhat Meets Requirements Some errors overall good effort could have been better Does not positively stand out/not memorable "too bad, could have been better"	Meets Requirements Standards are met. Thorough approach and standards for this level of program. Delivered what was required/expected. "Ok this is fine"	Exceeds Requirements/Exceptional!! Attention to details shows content reflects weight of assignment Stands out above the crowd/group Exceeds expectations and requirements "wow! great job"

Keywords:

Flagship Event Logistics Plan

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric