iRubric: NURS 584 Global Health Policy Analysis rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

NURS 584 Global Health Policy Analysis

NURS 584 Position Paper Rubric

Rubric Code: JX782XB

By taklein

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Political Science

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: (none)

Criterion
	Poor 60 pts	Fair 80 pts	Excellent 100 pts
Overall Content and Development 50 %	Poor - Content is incomplete as specified in assignment --Major points poorly or inadequately addressed and lack support with required references. --Research is inadequate for course objectives	Fair - Content is complete as specified in the assignment - Major points are addressed and supported with required references. - Research is adequate for course objectives	Excellent - Content is clear, comprehensive, and persuasive incorporating all elements specified in the assignment and expanding on them. - Major points are stated clearly and are supported with required and supplemental references. - Research synthesizes course objectives with learning from other courses.
Format 10 %	Poor - Paper lacks many elements of correct policy analysis format - Citations and references are not provided or citations are used without appropriate attribution -Paper is less than length requirements	Fair - Paper follows correct policy analysis format with minimal errors -Citations and references are used appropriately and attributed appropriately -Paper exceeds length requirements	Excellent - Paper follows correct policy analysis format - Citations and references are used appropriately and attributed appropriately --Paper meets length requirements
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 10 %	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or lacks scholarly tone	Fair - Paper contains minimal grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Excellent - Rules of grammar, usage, spelling and punctuation are followed - Language is clear and precise with varied structure and scholarly tone.
Reflection and Comparative Analysis 30 %	Poor -Reflection does not follow suggested content construction - Required components of paper are missing - Analysis is disjointed and lack transition of thoughts or comparative components --Peer feedback is ignored or minimized	Fair -Reflection follows suggested content construction -Components of paper are present but do not follow logical order - Paragraph transitions need improvement. --Reflection addresses comparative analysis but does not fully synthesize comparisons and/or peer feedback	Excellent - Reflection is clear, organized and incorporates all elements of suggested content construction with fluid transitions and logical ordering and conclusion --Reflection contains comparative analysis, synthesis, and feedback from peer feedback as indicated

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric