iRubric: Assignments Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Assignments Rubric

Use this rubric for grading student scientific Assignments

Rubric Code: JX76A6C

By Radhakrishnan

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Criterion
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 0.5 pts	Good 1 pts
Content & Development 2 pts	Poor - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.	Fair - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive. - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. - Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Good - Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. - Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Format 1 pts	Poor - Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting. - Paragrpah is inadequate/excessive in length.	Fair - Paper follows most guidelines. - Paper is over/ under word length.	Good - Paper follows designated guidelines. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Organization & Structure 2 pts	Poor - Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. - Paragraph is disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Fair - Structure of the paragraph is not easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions need improvement.	Good - Structure of the paragraph is clear and easy to follow.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 1 pts	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.	Fair - Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Good - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Timelines 1 pts	Poor Paper was turned in more than 2 days late	Fair Paper was turned in 1-2 days late	Good Paper was turned in on time.
Research evidences for the Title 2 pts	Poor Research studies and literature from Websites	Fair Research studies and literature from Websites and from text books	Good Research evidences and review of literature from RCT and from jounal of high impact factor and from textbooks
Illustrations and Images 1 pts	Poor No relevant Pictures . Flow charts to explain the concepts	Fair Relevant colored PictureS without explanation and illegible Flow charts to explain the concepts	Good Relevant colored Pictures with good quality and information. Systematic Flow charts to explain the concepts.