iRubric: Culture Report rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Culture Report

This rubric is for grading student's written assignments in BA366 Organizational Behavior at Pepperdine University (Seaver College) Alan E. Nelson, Ed.D.

Rubric Code: JA372C

By aenelson

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Strong Growth Opportunities (N/A)	Room for Improvement (N/A)	Strong (N/A)	Very Strong (N/A)
Writing Basics 10 % High impact writing; grammar; syntax; punctuation	Strong Growth Opportunities Rough high school quality writing with numerous issues noted	Room for Improvement Good high school quality writing, but not reflecting college level; several issues noted	Strong Overall good writing at undergrad level, with some minor areas for improvement	Very Strong Quality upper level college writing with only minor issues, here and there
Cultural Explanation 50 % Focus on the affective elements of the culture; noting personalities, network, formal vs. informal, hierarchical vs. flat, leadership styles, networks, etc.	Strong Growth Opportunities Explained the org like Spock (out of tune with affective elements); little sense of power, leadership, or how people relate to each other or behave internally; few key insights	Room for Improvement Sporadic sense of what goes on affectively and how the culture looks and feels, but a bit disjointed and with holes; lack of insider perspective	Strong Overall strong and succinct presentation of the affective sides of the org; includes elements of networks, power, influence; insider perspectives	Very Strong Similar qualities as "Strong" criteria, along with the inclusion of text and class content, along with appropriate references
Metaphor 30 % Provide a clear and distinct metaphor that represents each org	Strong Growth Opportunities Metaphor did not seem to fit and/or are not really metaphors (i.e. idiom or odd comparison); fails to explain why the metaphors represent the orgs	Room for Improvement Good metaphor selection, but failure to support how the metaphor's qualities parallel with the orgs' characteristics	Strong Strong and appropriate metaphor selection for org, along with a clear assessment of how the qualities of the metaphor matches the characteristics of the org	Very Strong Same qualities of the "Strong" criteria; brief comparing and contrasting of metaphor; strong visual provided
Presentation 10 % The mini-presentation was clear, well organized and succinct	Strong Growth Opportunities Class presentation seemed disjointed; lack of PowerPoint slides	Room for Improvement Good verbal presentation; no visuals; some lack of clarity in the minds of the listeners; ran overtime	Strong Clear and succinct presentation; provided visuals or such thorough explanation of metaphors that audience "got it;" stayed within time parameters.	Very Strong Same qualities of "Strong" criteria; succinct and informative; making presenters seem like an expert

Keywords:

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric