iRubric: Personal Theory of Counseling Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Personal Theory of Counseling Paper

Use this rubric for grading class assignments. Can be customized for any subject.

Rubric Code: DXWW366

By kheadley

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Criterion
	Beginning 140 pts	Approaching 160 pts	Meeting 172 pts	Exceeding 200 pts
Epistemology/worldview	Beginning -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR> - Questions were not adequately answered.	Approaching - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR> - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meeting - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.	Exceeding - Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR> - Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Integration/faith in counseling	Beginning -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR> - Questions were not adequately answered.	Approaching - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR> - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meeting - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.	Exceeding - Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.<BR> - Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Relationship in Counseling	Beginning -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR> - Questions were not adequately answered.	Approaching - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR> - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meeting - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.	Exceeding - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Influential Theories	Beginning -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR> - Questions were not adequately answered.	Approaching - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR> - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meeting - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.	Exceeding - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Techniques	Beginning -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR> - Questions were not adequately answered.	Approaching - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR> - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meeting - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.	Exceeding - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Strengths and Limitations	Beginning -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR> - Questions were not adequately answered.	Approaching - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR> - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meeting - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.	Exceeding - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Success/Failure	Beginning -Content is incomplete.<BR> - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR> - Questions were not adequately answered.	Approaching - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.<BR> - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. <BR> - Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.<BR> - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Meeting - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.	Exceeding - Content is accurate and persuasive.<BR> - Major points are stated.<BR> - Responses are adequate and address assignment.<BR> - Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
APA Style & Appropriate Sources	Beginning -APA style is not used<BR> - sources are not cited and/or referenced<BR> - sources are not scholarly or inadequate	Approaching -Some APA formatting used<BR> - some sources cited & referenced correctly<BR> - some sources appropriate	Meeting - Attempt to use APA format throughout is clear<BR> - sources mostly cited and refernced correctly<BR> -sources are adequate and appropriate	Exceeding - APA style used almost perfectly<BR> - citations and references all correctly formatted<BR> - sources go above minimum and are used in sophisticated ways
Coherence & Analyses	Beginning - Assignment lacks many elements of correct formatting.<BR> - Assignment is inadequate in length/depth of thought.<BR> -- Analyses<BR> are not included.	Approaching - Assignment follows most guidelines.<BR> -- Insufficient analyses are included. <BR> -Analyses do not adequately address the questions posed. <BR> -Analyses are not well organized or clear.	Meeting - Assignment follows designated guidelines.<BR> - Assignement is the appropriate length. <BR> -Format is good.<BR> -Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. <BR> posed.	Exceeding - Assignment follows all designated guidelines.<BR> - Assignment is the appropriate length/depth of thought.<BR> -Format enhances readability of work.<BR> -Analyses are organized logically, clearly presented, titled properly, easy to understand by a lay reader, and directly address the questions posed

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric