Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Advocacy Assignment (Tiffany's Project) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Advocacy Assignment (Tiffany's Project)
Advocacy Project
This rubric is for grading the Final Advocacy Paper.
Rubric Code:
BXA7B94
By
ssherrod
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Exceptional
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Substandard
1 pts
Content & Discussion
48 pts
Advocacy project purpose and research
Exceptional
- The purpose of the advocacy project is clear.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
-Content is accurate and complete
Good
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Content is accurate.
Fair
- Content is accurate <BR>
- Content is mostly complete
Poor
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported or discussed.
Substandard
- Content is incomplete.<BR>
- Major required topics are lacking or not all included or poorly discussed.
Plan of Action/Stratergy
30 pts
Exceptional
- Provided an exceptional plan of action, and/or strategic plan for the advocacy project that could actually be enacted.
Good
-Provided a good plan of action, and/or strategic plan for the advocacy project that could actually be enacted..
Fair
- Provided a fair plan of action, and/or strategic plan for the advocacy project that could actually be enacted.
Poor
- Provided a poor plan of action, and/or strategic plan for the advocacy project that could actually be enacted.
Substandard
- Provided a substandard plan of action, and/or strategic plan for the advocacy project that could actually be enacted.
Organization & Structure
24 pts
Timeline
Exceptional
- Conclusion flows from the body of paper.
- Introduction previews major points.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions are logical.
One full page reflection from all student
Good
- Structure of the paper is clear.
- Paragraph transitions are logical.
One full page reflection from most student
Fair
- Structure of the paper is fairly clear.
One full page reflection from some student
Poor
- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. <BR>
- Introduction does not preview all major points.<BR>
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.<BR>
- Conclusion does not flow well.One full page reflection from 3-6 student
Substandard
- Structure detracts from the message of the writer.<BR>
- Introduction and/or conclusion is missing.<BR>
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Current Resource Publications Cited
6 pts
Exceptional
All sources are recent and relevant.
Good
Sources are mostly recent but some with questionable relevance or reliability.
Fair
Sources are recent but with questionable relevance or reliability.
Poor
Sources are not current, adequate or relevant.
Substandard
Selections earlier than 8 years to date.
APA Formatting
6 pts
Exceptional
- Paper follows APA designated guidelines with all required components.
Good
- Paper follows APA guidelines.<BR>
-Formattting is accurate with most required components.
Fair
- Paper follows most APA guidelines.<BR>
-Formattting is mostly accurate with most required components.
Poor
Paper lacks some elements of correct APA formattting.
Substandard
- Paper lacks many elements of correct APA formattting such as citations, title page, references, page numbers.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
6 pts
Exceptional
- Paper contains less than 1-2 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise.
Good
Paper contains very few grammatical, and a few punctuation and spelling errors.
Fair
- Paper contains few grammatical, and a few punctuation and spelling errors.
Poor
Paper contains some grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Substandard
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Keywords:
Advocacy
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.