iRubric: DHG 330 Table Clinic Report rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

DHG 330 Table Clinic Report

DHG 330 Table Clinic Presentation

For written report for table clinic presentation

Rubric Code: X89B93

By cwerdizar

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Poor Does not meet assignment objectives 1 pts	Fair Meets minimal number of assignment objectives 2 pts	Good Meets majority of assignment objectives 3 pts	Excellent Meets or exceeds assignment objectives 4 pts
Description of topic	Poor - Topic was not identified.	Fair - Topic mentioned but unclear	Good - Topic discussed with important information missing	Excellent - Topic was clearly discussed wtih no missing information
Introduction	Poor -Introduction is unclear	Fair - Introduction is weak and not concise	Good -Introduction discusses is mostly clear and concise.	Excellent - Introduction is clearly written and concise
EnterGrammar, Punctuation & S	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.	Fair -- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Good - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct.	Excellent - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
APA Format	Poor -Paper lacks many elements of correct APA formatting. - Paper is under word length (too short).	Fair - Paper contains many APA format errors. - Paper is excessive in length.	Good - Paper contains a few, if any, APA format errors. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.	Excellent - Paper follows all APA designated guidelines. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Page Length	Poor - Paper length was inadequate	Fair - Paper did not meet the requirements to develop topic	Good - Paper met the minimum number of pages required	Excellent - Paper exceeded the number of pages without being wordy
Resources	Poor - Did not provide resources	Fair -Most of the resources required were listed.	Good -All of the required resources were listed	Excellent -Four or more resources were listed -All resources were in correct APA format
Table Clinic	Poor -Student did not present table clinic	Fair -Student presented the table clinic but read information. - Student did not present informaiton in an enthusiastic manner	Good - Student presented most of the table clinic information memorized to the audience	Excellent -Student was prepared for presentation -Presentation contained all aspects of the case study
Visual Aids	Poor - There were no visual aids used	Fair - Visual aids were difficult to read and unrelated to the topic	Good - Visual aids were easy to read and related to the topic	Excellent -Visual aids were colorful and related to the topic -Visual aids were eye appealing and relative to the topic
Peer Evaluation	Poor -Peer evaluation provided was poor	Fair Peer evaluation was fair	Good Peer evaluation was good	Excellent Peer evaluation was excellent

Keywords:

Critical thinking and analysis

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric