- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Table Clinic Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Table Clinic Project Table Clinic Project Rubric Code: HX9B852 By jbutterfield Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Table Clinic Project
	Excellent Meets or exceeds assignment objectives 5 pts	Good Meets majority of assignment objectives 4 pts	Fair Meets minimal number of assignment objectives 3 pts	Poor Does not meet assignment objectives 2 pts
Table Clinic	Excellent Students fully prepared for presentation; readily able to answer questions knowledgeably and accurately	Good Students prepared for presentation; able to provide reasonable answers to all questions	Fair Students could have prepared more thoroughly; not able to readily answer all questions or lacked clarity and accuracy with answers	Poor Students not prepared for table clinic as evidenced by inability to answer 1 or more questions; presentation lacked focus and clarity
Visual Aids	Excellent Visual aids were appealing, enhanced the presentation, and held audience attention	Good Visual aids were appropriate for the topic and engaged the audience, but lacked a bit of creativity	Fair Visual aids lacked a degree of creativity and did little to enhance the presentation; may not have been best choice for topic	Poor Visual aids were not appropriate for the topic and/or lacked creativity; did not engage the viewer
Professionalism	Excellent Students presented material with confidence and professional demeanor; presentation enhanced understanding of topic	Good Students presented material in professional manner; may have lacked a degree of confidence	Fair Presented material in a disjointed manner that distracted from understanding of topic; demeanor may have lacked professionalism	Poor Presentation lacked professionalism and detracted from understanding of topic
Descriptions of drugs/items	Excellent Numerous appropriate descriptions identified and documented; presentation clearly developed from scholarly sources	Good Appropriate number and type of descriptions identified and documented; presentation was developed from scholarly sources but may have included questionable sources as well	Fair Descriptions not appropriately identified and/or documented; questionable or insufficient sources may have been used	Poor Descriptions not fully identified and/or documented; insufficient or unreliable sources may have been used