iRubric: Clinic Summaries Grading Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Clinic Summaries Grading Rubric

CJ 224 Assignment Grading Rubric

Rubric Code: D66C7X

By Dr_Tavoc

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion 24
	Poor Does not meet assignment objectives (N/A)	Fair Meets minimal number of assignment objectives (N/A)	Good Meets majority of assignment objectives (N/A)	Excellent Meets or exceeds assignment objectives (N/A)
Article Choice 4	Poor -Article selected is not from a peer-review journal. -Article is a commentary or editorial.	Fair - Article is from a peer-review journal but grossly outdated (>10 years). -Article is a review of the literature or original research.	Good -Article selected is somewhat current (> 5 yrs. but less than 10). -Article is a review of the literature or original research.	Excellent -Article selected is a current (<5 years). -Article is a review of the literature or original research.
Summary Content 8	Poor - Summary is unclear or overly detailed - Does not demonstrate paraphrasing (too many quotes)	Fair -Main idea is unclear (not specifically stated in wiring) - States at least one important detail. -Demonstrates little, if any, paraphrasing.	Good -Correctly identifies most of the main idea in a complete sentence -Important details are included but some might be missing -Some paraphrasing of information	Excellent - Main idea is identified in a clear and accurate manner - All important details are included using own words or statements
Organization & Structure 4	Poor -Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. -Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts. - Ideas are not in logical order -Missing a concluding statement	Fair - Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions need improvement. -Ideas are in random order and not logical - Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.	Good - Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. - Paragraph transitions are present. -Ideas are in logical order - Conclusion is logical and adequate.	Excellent -Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. -Details are in a logical order - Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper. - Conclusion is clear, logical, and specific.
APA Formatting 4	Poor - Paper lacks many elements of correct APA formatting. - Paper is under word length (too short).	Fair - Paper contains many APA format errors. - Paper is excessive in length (too long).	Good - Paper contains a few, if any, APA format errors. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.	Excellent - Paper follows all APA designated guidelines. - Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 4	Poor - Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone.	Fair - Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.	Good - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct.	Excellent - Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. - Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

Keywords:

Critical thinking and analysis

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric