iRubric: Investigating History and The South Class Presentation Rubri rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Investigating History and The South Class Presentation Rubri

Rubric to score both the Powerpoint Slides as well as the overall teaching/public speaking performance of the group. This rubric takes into account the slides; presentation, quality of teaching tools, and strategies to teach ideas to the class.

Rubric Code: ZXA53X9

By mslrguy

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Grading Rubric
	Exemplary 10 pts	Very Good 8.5 pts	Basic 7 pts	Unsatisfactory 6 pts
Content	Exemplary Slides contain relevant compelling information on the subject matter. Content is based on research information including information from several sources including the photocopied packet. Content may also reference Beacon on The Hill; The Souls of Black Folk; The Atlanta Exposition Speech; Greenleaf; or another text (literature circle). Video is outstanding and greatly enhances presentation	Very Good Slides contain information relevant to the disaster. Content is based on research from primarily two sources. Misses an opportunity to reference texts read in class or examples from class lecture. Video is appropriate and supports topic.	Basic Slides contain minimal or too much information on the subject matter. Misses several opportunities to integrate information from text class reads or literature circle text. Video choice can be improved as it neither adds nor takes away from presentation.	Unsatisfactory Slides do not contain relevant information.<BR> The disaster is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on. Video may detract student attention or may not be the best selection to teach or reinforce the content.
Graphics/Slides	Exemplary Slides are attractive/aesthetically pleasing. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Graphics and effects are used throughout to enhance presentation. Information is at the advanced level and consistently supports images. Slides are not bombarded with text. Animation is used to hold attention.	Very Good Slides are legible. Text is legible. Few to no grammatical errors. Half the slides have graphics or effects which enhance understanding and aesthetics. Information supports images. Some technology used within slides to enhance materials.	Basic Slides are legible. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Some grammatical errors. Few slides have graphics or effects. Information supports images at times. Little to no use of media.	Unsatisfactory The slides are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There are many grammatical errors. There is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images. No evidence of media used to enhance the materials of slides.
Presentation/Organization	Exemplary The presentation is well coordinated. All material is presented using language that is original. Speakers are well informed and elaborate beyond the displayed material as needed. Looks like a team effort with no one student doing all of the teaching or talking. All components are included. Excellent management of instructional time. Teaching strategies are used to introduce and teach material. Demonstrates original thought and time/effort.	Very Good The presenters make consistent eye contact with the audience. Speakers are clear, and present information beyond the displayed material. All aspects of presentation are included. One speaker may do more of talking or all elements are not covered. Good management of time. Good use of strategies to introduce and assess materials.	Basic The presenters make minimal eye contact with the audience. Most information is read directly from the screen or page. Lacks emotional connection to the material. Is not evident that all members have command of the information. Presentation may be missing elements. Team members may be distracted. Activities presented are missed opportunities of time.	Unsatisfactory More like a lecture than a presentation. Very few strategies to teach the information to the class. Appears that group members withhold information for fear of knowing more than other team members. Imbalanced presentation; missing aspects/requirements. Missed opportunities to teach content.
Warm-Up	Exemplary Unique, engaging, thoughtful warm-up that fosters deep thinking and prepares students to absorb new information.	Very Good Good warm-up. May be sligtly more engage	Basic Inquiry questions are turned in with few notes and research.	Unsatisfactory Inquiry questions are not turned in.
Assessment& Teaching Strategies	Exemplary Assessment Tools/Teaching Strategies are appropriate, creative (unique--not the same as all other groups) engaging and help teach material. Includes material from packet (if applicable).	Very Good Assessment Tools/Strategies are appropriate and engaging.	Basic Assessment Tools/Strategies may not be a best fit for the information needed to teach.	Unsatisfactory Very few observed strategies to engage/teach the class or presented in bland way.
Bibliography/Cited Sources	Exemplary Submitted bibliography/cited sources by due date with explanation of what was obtained from each source. Correct MLA/APA Format used for articles, videos, images/pictures; packet, information.	Very Good Submitted bibliography/cited sources by due date with explanation of what was obtained from each source. Correct MLA/APA Format used for articles, videos, images/pictures; packet, information. Missing a few sources.	Basic Submitted bibliography by due date. Sources and Slides mismatch-- there are too few sources listed on the bibliography. A Mixture of just hyperlinks and traditionally formatting instead of traditional formatting plus hyperlinks.	Unsatisfactory Incomplete or not submitted on time. Submitted only hyperlinks and did not follow directions as provided and on the OWL at Purdue Website for Formatting.

Keywords:

Research and PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric