Skip to main content
iRubric: If organelles could talk rubric

iRubric: If organelles could talk rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
If organelles could talk 
Cell Story/Cartoon Rubric
Come up with story or cartoon for cell organelles. Create a visually appealing project to demonstrate understanding of cell anatomy. Some examples could include a poster, a comic book, or other visual medium that includes writing.
Rubric Code: VX999XX
By lisadebany
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric If Organelles Could Talk
  Minimal

2 pts

Developing

4 pts

Basic

5 pts

Proficient

8 pts

Advanced

10 pts

Story and Characters

Minimal

* Few organelles (characters) were presented in project.<BR>
* Only a few were explained. <BR>
* More than 3 organelles (characters) were incorrect.
Developing

* Some organelles (characters) were present (Missing 3)<BR>
* Each organelle (character) described or represented the characteristics of the organelle <BR>
* 2-3 organelles (character) was incorrect or did not accurately demonstrate structure, function, relationship, and importance in the cell.
Basic

* Most organelles (characters) were present (Missing 2)<BR>
* Each organelle (character) described or represented the characteristics of the organelle <BR>
* Only 1 organelle (character) was incorrect or did not accurately demonstrate structure, function, relationship, and importance in the cell.
Proficient

* Most organelles (characters) were present (1 missing)<BR>
* Each organelle (character) described or represented the characteristics of the organelle. Structure and function relationships description is lacking accuracy.
Advanced

* All organelles (characters) were present<BR>
* Each organelle (character) described or represented the characteristics of the organelle structure,function, relationship, and importance in cell.
Visuals

Minimal

* Project reflects little effort.
* Very little color and only one or no visuals. <BR>
* Writing is small and hard to read.<BR>
* 4 or more of the organelles were not represented on poster.
Developing

* Project reflects reduced effort. <BR>
* Limited color and visuals. <BR>
* Writing is hard to read.<BR>
* 2-3 of the organelles were not represented on poster.
Basic

* Project reflects some seriousness and effort. <BR>
* Has some color and is creative.<BR>
* More effort could have been put into the visual part of the project.<BR>
* Writing is hand-written, but can be read.<BR>
* 1 organelle was not represented on poster.
Proficient

* Good use of visuals with typed captions.<BR>
* Visuals are creative and colorful and reflect the seriousness of the project.<BR>
* All cell organelles with analogies were represented in the project.
Advanced

* Good use of visuals with typed captions.<BR>
* Visuals are creative and colorful and reflect the seriousness of the project.<BR>
* All cell organelles discussed in class were represented on the poster.
Organization & Content

Minimal

* Project is unclear in the message.<BR>
* Project reflects little time or effort in organization.<BR>
* The title, captions and other writing is difficult to read and does not make sense to the reader.
Developing

* Project is difficult to understand, but outlines basic principle.<BR>
* Project reflects some time and effort in organization.<BR>
* Title, captions, and other writing difficult to read, but makes sense to reader.
Basic

* Project develops analogies, but not completely accurate.<BR>
* Title and other writing is small and not easy to read. <BR>
* Could have put more effort into the organization part of the project.<BR>
* Few spelling or grammatical mistakes
Proficient

* Project has a clear, readable analogy.<BR>
* Writing is easy to read and makes sense. <BR>
* Little or no spelling or grammar errors. <BR>
* Great effort on organization.
Advanced

* Project has a strong, well developed analogy.<BR>
* Writing is easy to read and makes sense. <BR>
* Clean of spelling or grammar errors. <BR>
* Great effort on organization.
Overall criteria for project

Minimal

* Did not follow directions <BR>
* Not visually appealing<BR>
* Unclear analogies<BR>
* Turned in something to get a grade, and is not neat or organized.
Developing

* Did not follow directions<BR>
* Hard to understand analogies<BR>
* Little organization and neatness
Basic

* Did not follow directions<BR>
* Eventually able to figure out what analogy is being conveyed<BR>
* Some organization and neatness.
Proficient

* Followed instructions almost to the letter<BR>
* Visually appealing, with interesting information<BR>
* Can understand what analogy is being addressed<BR>
* Student knows project is a reflection of what was learned <BR>
* Project is neat and organized.
Advanced

* Directions well followed<BR>
* Visually appealing, creativity present<BR>
* Analogy being addressed very clear and developed<BR>
* Clear connection to class material, goes beyond basic understanding<BR>
* Project is neat and organized.
Communication

Minimal

1 Point <BR>
<BR>
Student communicates process and materials used with little effectiveness. <BR>
<BR>
Student rarely uses appropriate terminology.
Developing

2 Points <BR>
<BR>
Student communicates process and materials used somewhat effectively. <BR>
<BR>
Student sometimes uses appropriate terminology.
Basic

3 Points <BR>
<BR>
Student communicates process and materials used effectively. <BR>
<BR>
Student uses appropriate terminology.
Proficient

4 Points <BR>
<BR>
Student communicates process and materials used effectively and with extreme accuracy. <BR>
<BR>
Student uses appropriate terminology with ease.
Advanced

Exemplary communication of material using effective terminology with ease.
Student engages the audience and accurately communicates the organelles and makes presentation interesting.



Keywords:
  • Project


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98