Skip to main content
iRubric: Global Warming PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

iRubric: Global Warming PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Global Warming PowerPoint Presentation Rubric 
PowerPoint Presentation Rubric
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project. This rubric will used to score your presentation. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when composing the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the PowerPoint presentation, to ensure that all criteria have been met.
Rubric Code: T5XA9B
By dware1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Grading Rubric
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Content - Describe Problem

The potential causes of global warming will be discussed.

Also, global warming will be described from the standpoint of what types of problems it is likely to cause.
Excellent

The paper clearly and thoroughly describes the problem by identifying (4) causes (human and natural.) The paper identifies (6) likely consequences.
Good

The paper adequately describes the potential problem by indentifying (3) causes (human and natural.) Discussion of the potential consequences is incomplete, identifies (5).
Fair

The paper lacks a clear description of the potential problem by identifying (2) causes. The paper identifies (4) perceived consequences.
Poor

The paper provides an insufficient description of the problem - by identifying (1) or none of the causes. The paper identifies (3) or fewer consequences.


There is little or no discussion of the likely long-term consequences.
Content - Pre-historical Evidence

All sources of pre-historical evidence will be accurately summarized and interpreted: ice core data from Antarctica and Greenland, sedimentation data from remote arctic lakes, tree ring data, coral reef data and pre-historical written accounts that describe climate-related phenomena.
Excellent

All (5) of the pre-historical evidence is discussed*. The interpretation of the evidence is accurate and written in a clear and coherent manner. *see list in the first column of this rubric*
Good

Some (4) of the pre-historical evidence is discussed*. The interpretation of the historical evidence is largely accurate. *see list in the first column of this rubric*
Fair

There is little (3) discussion of the pre-historical evidence. *

The paper may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of the historical data. *see list in the first column of this rubric*
Poor

There is little (2) or no discussion of the pre-historical evidence. *

The paper may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of the historical data. *see list in the first column of this rubric*
Content - Modern Evidence

Data from the past 100 years will be described with a particular emphasis on global temperature data and carbon dioxide levels.
Excellent

Includes (4) examples of recent historical evidence in the discussion.

The interpretation of the evidence is accurate and written in a clear and coherent manner.
Good

Includes (2) examples of the recent historical evidence in the discussion.

The interpretation of the historical evidence is largely accurate.
Fair

Includes (1) example of the recent historical evidence.

The paper may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of the historical data.
Poor

Does not provide an example or provides inaccurate information about recent historical evidence.

The paper may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of the historical data.
Conclusion - INDIVIDUAL

You will either support or refute the idea that global warming is occurring and that global warming is going to lead to catastrophic problems for a significant portion of the world. EACH group member must submit separate, INDIVIDUAL conclusions (not copies of the same conclusion.)
Excellent

The conclusion of the paper is completely supported by the evidence presented.

The conclusion is consistent with the premise of the paper.

All the necessary supporting evidence is provided within the paper.
Good

Speaker is well informed and elaborates a bit beyond the material displayed.
Fair

The conclusion of the paper is not supported by the evidence presented.

Any conclusion expressed is simply opinions that lack any supporting evidence.
Poor

Speaker simply reads the material displayed.
Voice/Speaking Skills

You will present your position/argument to your instructor and your classmates using effective presentation skills.
Excellent

Speaker presents in a loud and clear voice and does not read.

Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Good

Speaker presents in a loud and clear voice - may use note card (no larger than 4X6.)

Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Fair

Speaker presents in a voice that is sometimes clear, but simply reads from the presentation.

Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact.
Poor

Speaker does not present in a loud or clear voice and reads simply from the presentation.

Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation.
Proper Citation & Time Management

Whatever your argument, you will cite appropriate supporting data from your sources. Any information taken from any source material needs to be properly cited (MLA format) and included in your bibliography.
Excellent

All appropriate source material is correctly cited using the MLA format -includes a bibliography (Works Cited page.)
AND
Presentation meets the 2 minutes per group member or 8 minutes for group time requirement*.
*Refer to briefing on time management*
Good

Sources are cited inconsistently. The formatting of cited literature is largely correct and consistent. Not all of the sources cited were actually used.
(use MLA format)
Fair

Sources are cited inconsistently or not at all. There is either incorrect or no clear formatting of the source material.
(use MLA format)
Poor

Sources are not cited. There is either incorrect or no clear formatting of the source material (use MLA format.)
AND
Presentation is over or under minutes for time requirement*.
*Refer to briefing on time management*



Keywords:
  • PowerPoint Presentation Rubric



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98