iRubric: Google Maps Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Google Maps Project

Evaluates an assignment using Google Map skills whereby the students create a map of their own utilising the features of Google Maps. In this instance, the students were locating important people, places, art from the Italian Renaissance.

Rubric Code: SX58469

By vshannik

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Criteria
	Exceeds Expections 4 pts	Fully Meet Expectations 3 pts	Meets Expectations 2 pts	Minimally Meets Expectations 1 pts	Does not Meet Expectations 0 pts
LOCATION	Exceeds Expections All placemarks are in appropriate places; many are uniquely located.	Fully Meet Expectations The majority of placemarks are appropropriately located; some are uniquely located.	Meets Expectations Most placemarks are appropriately located.	Minimally Meets Expectations Some placemarks are appropriately located	Does not Meet Expectations Very few placemarks are appropriately located.
POINT EXPLANATION	Exceeds Expections All of the placemarks are named and explained. Interesting facts and details are included. Student has included original/personal information about the places.	Fully Meet Expectations Most placemarks are named and explained. Most include interesting facts and details. One or two original pieces of information included	Meets Expectations Most placemarks are named and some are explained. A few facts and details are included. Little effort to include original information.	Minimally Meets Expectations Some placemarks are named but only a few are explained. No original information included.	Does not Meet Expectations Very few placemarks are named or explained.
USE OF CLASS TIME	Exceeds Expections Time used highly effectively as evidenced through 1. Task completed within allocated time 2. Creative and appropriate use of placemarks, lines and shapes 3. Links and images inserted <BR> 4. Student remains on task thoroughout lesson	Fully Meet Expectations	Meets Expectations Time generally used effectively as evidenced through: 1. Task completed within allocated time 2. Appropriate use of placemarks, lines and shapes 3. Some links and images inserted 4. Student is on task for most of the lesson	Minimally Meets Expectations	Does not Meet Expectations Time generally used effectively as evidenced through: 1. Task not completed within allocated time 2. Little attention to use of appropriate placemarks, lines and shapes 3. Links and or images not included 4. Student has to be reminded several times to get on task
ORGANISATION AND IMAGES	Exceeds Expections Image is correct for the place, is interesting and supports the explanation. All sources acknowledged. Appropriate links included.	Fully Meet Expectations Image is correct for the place, is interesting and supports the explanation. Most sources acknowledged. Many appropriate links included.	Meets Expectations Image is correct for the place and supports the explanation. Some sources acknowledged. Some appropriate links included.	Minimally Meets Expectations Image is correct for the place. Few sources acknowledged. Only 1 or 2 links included.	Does not Meet Expectations Images don't necessarily match the location or explanation. No sources acknowledged. No links included
WRITTEN EXPLAINATION	Exceeds Expections There is clear evidence of thought to explain: why the points were selected, who the map would be useful for, choice of layout. Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with a high degree of effectiveness (no spelling/grammar errors)	Fully Meet Expectations There is evidence of thought to explain: why the points were selected, who the map would be useful for, choice of layout. Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with considerable effectiveness [few spelling/grammar errors (2 errors)]	Meets Expectations There is thought to explain: why the points were selected, who the map would be useful for, choice of layout. Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with some effectiveness [some spelling/grammar errors (3 errors)]	Minimally Meets Expectations The is little to no explanation for: why the points were selected, who the map would be useful for, choice of layout. Uses conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline with limited effectiveness [major spelling/grammar errors ( 4 and more errors)]	Does not Meet Expectations There is no write up or it has no connection to the map.

Keywords:

Google Maps Project

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric