Skip to main content
iRubric: Discussion Forum/Question Rubric

iRubric: Discussion Forum/Question Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion Forum/Question Rubric 
The criteria found in this rubric will be used to assess the quality of a student's initial postings, responses to the initial posts and occasional responses to other question posed within the module. Note that the heaviest emphasis is on the initial post.
Rubric Code: PX35942
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric DQ Initial Post
  Excellent

3 pts

Good

2.5 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1.5 pts

No Credit/No Submission

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Critical Analysis
50 %

Understanding of Readings and Outside References

Excellent

Discussion postings display an excellent understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology. Postings integrate an outside resource, or relevant research, or specific real-life application (work experience, prior coursework, etc.) to support important points. Well-edited quotes are cited appropriately. No more than 10% of the posting is a direct quotation. Answers question completely.
Good

Discussion postings display an understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology and proper citation. No more than 10% of the posting is a direct quotation. Answers question completely.
Fair

Discussion postings repeat and summarize basic, correct information, but do not link readings to outside references, relevant research or specific real-life application and do not consider alternative perspectives or connections between ideas. Sources are not cited. question partially answered.
Poor

Discussion postings show little or no evidence that readings were completed or understood. Postings are largely personal opinions or feelings, or "I agree" or "Great idea", without supporting statements with concepts from the readings, outside resources, relevant research, or specific real-life application. Major portion of question ignored.
No Credit/No Submission

Student did not attempt activity
Response/reply Content
25 %

Excellent

Replies show insight, depth and understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed and clearly related to the original post. Thoughtful questions were posed to further discussion of the topic.
Good

Replies show insight, depth and understanding. They connect with the original post. Personal opinion is appropriately expressed and clearly related to the original post. Thoughtful questions were posed to further discussion of the topic.
Fair

Replies are rather simple, but show some insight, depth or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed and posts as a whole show understanding. Questions were posed to further discussion of the topic.
Poor

Responses are simple replies that lack insight, depth or are superficial.
Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the original post or simply agree/disagree with it. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding. No questions posed to further discussion.
No Credit/No Submission

Student did not attempt activity
Quality of Writing/Proofreading
15 %

Grammar, punctuation, spelling and style.

Excellent

Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.
Good

Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication.
Fair

Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader.
Poor

Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication.
No Credit/No Submission

Student did not attempt activity
Etiquette and Attitude
5 %

Excellent

Responses show respect, interest and and a high degree of sensitivity to peers gender, cultural and linguistic background.Responses show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Good

Responses show respect, interest and sensitivity to peers gender, cultural and linguistic background.Responses show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others.
Fair

Some of the responses show respect and interest in the viewpoints of others, with no blatant disregard.
Poor

Responses are disrespectful or insensitive.
No Credit/No Submission
Timeliness
5 %

Excellent

Both initial posts and first responses are posted a day earlier than required.

Initial - Tues
Response - Thurs
Good

Both the initial post and the first response post meet requirements

Initial - Wed
Response - Friday
Fair

Either the initial post or responses are late but allow enough time for some dialogue within the week.
Initial - Fri
Response - Sat
Poor

One or both posts are too late to allow for dialogue within the week.


Both - Sunday or not within module week.
No Credit/No Submission

None



Keywords:
  • Homework







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16