iRubric: Stage 3 Compare/Contrast Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Stage 3 Compare/Contrast Rubric

Students compare and contrast two persuasive texts, identify the author's purpose, message, techniques plus any additional features or content. The students present this during 3 separate sessions, whereby students endeavour to comprehend more complex meaning and information presented within each text.

Rubric Code: FXA8W8B

By joceron

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Reading

Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Compare & Contrast Organiser
	Outstanding 5 pts	Above Satisfactory 4 pts	Statisfactory 3 pts	Below Satisfactory 2 pts	Make Corrections - Re-do 1 pts
Contrasting points	Outstanding There are greater than (20) twentycontrasting examples with supporting detail which demonstrates detailed and complex thought processes	Above Satisfactory There are at least (12) twelve contrasting examples with supporting detail which demonstrates some complex thought process	Statisfactory There are at least (9) nine contrasting examples with supporting detail which attempts to present complex thought processes	Below Satisfactory There are at least (6) two contrasting examples	Make Corrections - Re-do Student has provided less < 3 three any contrasting examples Re-Do.
Comparison points	Outstanding There are greater than (10) ten comparison examples with supporting detail which demonstrates detailed and complex thought processes	Above Satisfactory There are at least (7) seven comparison examples with supporting detail which demonstrates some complex thought process	Statisfactory There are at least (5) five comparison examples with supporting detail which attempts to present complex thought processes	Below Satisfactory There are at least (4) four comparison examples	Make Corrections - Re-do Student has provided less < 3 three any comparison examples Re-Do.
Thought Processes	Outstanding There are at least (6) six examples in each of 3 Level Processing (1st; 2nd & 3rd Thoughts)	Above Satisfactory There are at least (4) four examples in each of 3 Level Processing (1st; 2nd & 3rd Thoughts)	Statisfactory There are at least (3) two examples in each of 3 Level Processing (1st; 2nd & 3rd Thoughts) .	Below Satisfactory There are at least (2) two examples in each of 3 Level Processing (1st; 2nd & 3rd Thoughts) .	Make Corrections - Re-do Limited or no demonstration of 3 Level Processing (1st; 2nd & 3rd Thoughts) Re-do
Response Structure	Outstanding Responses are of an appropriate length, make sense, and are free of subject/verb disagreements. **Genius level sentences	Above Satisfactory Response are of an appropriate length, mostly make sense, and/OR there are some subject/verb disagreements.	Statisfactory Response are of an appropriate length, mostly make sense, and there are some subject/verb disagreements.	Below Satisfactory Texts contains many errors which are distracting to the reader.	Make Corrections - Re-do Text is unreadable due to too many errors. Re-Do.
Vocabulary	Outstanding Vocabulary - i.e., word choice is highly technical and mature and shows understanding of the meaning. Consistent throughout	Above Satisfactory Vocabulary - i.e., word choice is strong and shows understanding of the meaning. Consistent throughout	Statisfactory Most vocabulary words are used appropriately Inconsistent	Below Satisfactory Vocabulary - i.e., word choice is weak and doesn't show understanding of the meaning.	Make Corrections - Re-do Word choice is unclear and doesn't make sense in the sentences. Re-Do.
Work Ethic	Outstanding Student made good use of his/her time, produced quality work and stayed on task during the entire task	Above Satisfactory Student made good use of his/her time and stayed on task during the entire task	Statisfactory Student made good use of his/her time, but had to be reminded to stay focused or on task once.	Below Satisfactory Student made poor use of his/her time and had to be reminded to stay on task more than once.	Make Corrections - Re-do Student was not on task and was distracting other students.

Keywords:

Compare/Contrast

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric