Skip to main content
iRubric: Curated Collection Rubric

iRubric: Curated Collection Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Curated Collection Rubric 
Assignment 3: Social Media Curation /PKM
Assignment For Independent Research Project (IRP)
Rubric Code: WX9932X
By pollacks21
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Curated Collection Rubric
  Far Below Standard/F

(N/A)

Below Standard/D

(N/A)

Approaching Standard/C

(N/A)

Meets Standard/B

(N/A)

Exceed Standard/A

(N/A)

Source Variety

20 points
Far Below Standard/F

Curator only includes sources from one genre/source type--his/her list is incomplete.
Below Standard/D

Curator's resources include sources from only two or three genres/
source types and therefore do not meet the assignment requirement.
Approaching Standard/C

Curator's resources include some variety, but may be missing one or two resources from genres/source types specified by the assignment.
Meets Standard/B

Curator's resources include at least one resource from each of the genres/source types specified by the assignment.
Exceed Standard/A
Source Comprehension

25 points
Far Below Standard/F

Evidence suggests that the curator has NOT read his/her sources. He/she does not seem to understand the content of any resources or how any source helps answer his/her research questions.
Below Standard/D

Evidence suggests that the curator has merely skimmed each resource, does not understand its content, does not fully articulate how each source helps answer his/her research questions.
Approaching Standard/C

Evidence exists that the curator has read SOME of his/her sources, but may not understand their content completely and/or may not have articulated how each source helps answer his/her research questions.
Meets Standard/B

Evidence exists that the curator has read MOST of his/her sources, understands their content, and understands how each source helps answer his/her research questions.
Exceed Standard/A

Evidence exists that the curator has read EACH source, understands its content, and understands how each source helps answer his/her research questions.
Source Reflection

25 points
Far Below Standard/F

None of the resources are thoughtfully curated and therefore the collection not useful. Student has not reflected on how the audience benefits from these resources.
Below Standard/D

Most resources are not thoughtfully curated and therefore minimally useful to the curator and the audience. Student has not reflected on how the audience benefits from these resources.
Approaching Standard/C

Some resources curated are thoughtful and useful to the curator and the audience. Student has reflected on how the audience benefits from some of these resources.
Meets Standard/B

Most resources curated are thoughtful and useful to the curator and the audience. Student has reflected on how the audience benefits from most of these resources.
Exceed Standard/A

All resources curated are thoughtful and useful to the curator and the audience. Student has reflected on how the audience benefits from these resources.
Attribution/Links

15 points
Far Below Standard/F

Some links are inoperable and/or curator has not provided proper citation/
attribution for sources.
Below Standard/D

All or most links are operable and curator has provided minimal citation/
attribution for each source.
Approaching Standard/C

All links are operable and curator has provided proper citation/
attribution for some sources.
Meets Standard/B

All links are operable and curator has provided proper citation/
attribution for most sources.
Exceed Standard/A
Grammar/Mechanics

15 points
Far Below Standard/F

Severe errors in spelling, mechanics, and sentence structure interfere with audience comprehension of the curator's content.
Below Standard/D

Several errors in spelling, mechanics, and sentence structure interfere with audience comprehension of the curator's content.
Approaching Standard/C

Some errors in spelling, mechanics, and sentence structure may interfere with audience comprehension of the curator's content.
Meets Standard/B

Some errors in spelling, mechanics, and sentence structure, but do not interfere with audience comprehension of curator's content.
Exceed Standard/A

Few errors in spelling, mechanics, and sentence structure.



Keywords:
  • curation, knowledge management



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16