Skip to main content

iRubric: Reflection Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Reflection Rubric 
Periodic assessment of student Reflections and Reflective Responses In Response/Reflection Papers
Rubric Code: N23AAX4
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Philosophy  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Reflection
  Emerging

2 pts

Developing

3 pts

Proficient

4 pts

Extending

5 pts

Clarity of Focus

Emerging

Needs to continue to develop, focusing on the topic at hand and ensuring their arguments and perspectives connect with in-depth understandings and perspectives. There is no thesis and no attention to the Five Rs.
Developing

The main point or points are clear but need to be elaborated further on specifics to strengthen their perspectives, such as ignoring many steps within the Five R Process. The thesis is inferred, but it is unclear.
Proficient

The reflections show a proficient response which provides the reader a view into your thinking about the topic but lacks some aspects which would make it easier to respond, such as leaving out steps of the Five R Process. The thesis is viable but broad.
Extending

Focus is clear and substantial throughout the Reflection, giving the reader such a clear view into your thinking about the topic that the reader can easily find a point of entry to respond. The student addresses the 5 Rs and can clearly articulate the journey from analysis to a conclusion. The thesis is clear, relevant, and specific.
Intellectual Engagement

Emerging

The response needs to continue developing and reference issues raised through readings and/or class activities. No textual evidence is present. Incohesive and wanders from the topics presented through the Rs. Opinion paper. No attention to grammar and punctuation.
Developing

Entry references issues raised through readings and/or class activities but simply restates those ideas with little evidence of your own consideration. Quotes are used, but the textual analysis process is missing. Defaults to synopsis and opinions. The paper does not flow, and there are grammar mistakes.
Proficient

The Reflection response identifies and engages some of the issues raised in class with some evidence of your own consideration. Little attention to textual analysis. Sophisticated sentence structure and attention to grammar.
Extending

Reflection demonstrates thoughtful identification of and engagement with the important issues raised through reading, and/or class discussions, and/or activities. Student refrains from restating the story and defaulting to pathos (opinion) instead of logos (reasoning). Textual analysis is viable and clear. No grammatical or punctuation mistakes.



Keywords:
  • Reflection







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n67