Skip to main content
iRubric: Business_Reserach_Paper_FINAL rubric

iRubric: Business_Reserach_Paper_FINAL rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Business_Reserach_Paper_FINAL 
Business_Reserach_Paper_Part_One
Prof R Raymond Moral Issues in Business
Rubric Code: Y24XXWB
By t00046343
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Philosophy  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
  Excellent

This is a great paper!!

5 pts

Good

This is a good paper; almost there, but missing one or two important details

4 pts

Fair

This paper passes, but more work is needed to have your paper to be of high quality

3 pts

Poor

This is a paper, but you needed to ask more clarifying questions and put the work into making it perfect

2 pts

Content 5

Format
Excellent

--Topic interesting & an appropriate topic for research.
--Scholarly resources used
--Content strongly related to topic and appropriate for essay; this is clearly articulated in Intro Paragraph
-- Intro Paragraph does clearly integrates and analyzes all the elements of research, introducing the theory, and explanation of case study. Strong, clear thesis
--All subtitles of corporation are carefully and fully researched
Good

--Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or did not sufficiently research the topic.
--Scholarly resources used, but not quoted and analyzed.
--Content related to topic and appropriate for essay; this is suggested but not directly explained in Intro Paragraph
--Intro Paragraph suggests all the elements of research, introducing the theory, and explanation of case study; strong, clear thesis
-- Some subtitles are carefully and fully researched
Fair

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper.
--Resources marginally suitable for scholarly essay.
--Content somewhat related to topic and appropriate for essay.
Intro Paragraph does not integrate all the elements of research, introducing the theory, and explanation of case study
-- Thesis is not indicative of paper prompt
--Subtitles mentioned but research is topical
Poor

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper.
--Resources not suitable for scholarly essay.
--Content not related to topic and/or not appropriate for essay.
-- There is no mention or integration of the elements required in Intro Paragraph
No clear thesis
--Subtitles are inferred, but no proof of in-depth research
Introduction and Conclusion 5

Excellent

--Introduction provides contexts for the topic, background research explanation, sets out what will happen in the paper, a strong and clear thesis statement (argument/theory)
--Conclusion effectively wraps up the essay by summarizing all of the logical points, discussing the relevance and position of counter-claim, strengthens the thesis, concluding statement
Good

--Introduction is strong but could be improved to better grab the reader's attention. Provides contexts for the topic, background research information, strong, clear thesis (argument). Does not explain the paper to follow.
--Conclusion is effective but could be stronger. Summarizes the logical argument. Mentions counterclaim but no analysis. Strenthens thesis.
Fair

--Introduction is included but does not grab the reader's attention. Thesis weak/broad. Not an argument.
--Conclusion is included but is marginally effective. Lists all of the points. Doers not analyze the relevance of the research to the original thesis
Poor

--No introduction/
no conclusion.
--Introduction or conclusion does not serve intended purpose.
Organization and Synthesis 5

Excellent

--Clear and appropriate organization.
--Each body paragraph has a topic sentence and exposes the relevance of the research. Refers back to the thesis statement of the paper.
-- Moral theory and genealogy is expertly described and application methodology is clearly articulated
--Criteria are clearly explained and applied to individual instances of case study (citations)
-- Thorough research of corporation as it manifests
-- Statements of "missing" or non-accessible information
Good

--Organization slightly lacking clarity and/or structure.
--Each body paragraph has a clear topic sentence and exposes some of the relevance of the research. Refers back to the paper's thesis statement
-- Criteria are mentioned, but there is no specific application, but a broad purview; thorough but incomplete research of corporation as it manifests
Fair

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or structure. Broad claims with no specific analyses of research and particular articles/sources
--Criteria mentioned but not specifically applied to the case study
--Incomplete research into the corporation as it manifests
Poor

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion seriously lacking clarity and/or structure.
--No evidence of analyses
-- Criteria wrong or not mentioned; no application of such
-- No mention of corporation as it manifests
Grammar and Mechanics 5

Excellent

--Sentences and word choice demonstrates consistent variety.
--Few spelling errors.
-- Few punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all MLA/Harvard style and min. paragraph requirements
-- Smooth transitions between paragraphs
--Clear, articulate explanations
--Logos is the dominant appeal. The paper does not devolve into an opinion paper.
Good

--Some sentence and word variety used.
--No more than 3 spelling errors & Fewer than 3 punct./cap. errors.
--Met most style and min/max paragraph requirement
--Smooth transitions between paragraphs
-- Logos is the dominant appeal.
Fair

--Little variety in sentence construction or word choice.
-More than 5 spelling errors.
-- More than 5 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Failed to meet style min. paragraph requirements
Poor

--No variety in sentence construction or word choice.
--More than 7 spelling, punctuation, capitalization errors.
--Failed to meet style and/or min paragraph requirements
Quality of research 5/Bibliography

Excellent

--Cited 5 or more sources
--Sources reliable and parenthetically cited.
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth
--All sources properly cited in works cited page.
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Good

--Cited 4 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Sufficient information provided
--Research of sufficient depth.
--Most sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- 1-3 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair

--Cited 2-3 sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Surface research.
--Some sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- 4-6 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor

--Cited 1 or 0 sources
--Used less than 3 quotes
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information interferes with ability of reader to find the source.
--Surface research.
--Few sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- More than than 6 errors in format or punctuation



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98