Skip to main content
iRubric: EAT: Restaurant Review rubric

iRubric: EAT: Restaurant Review rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
EAT: Restaurant Review 
Film Evaluation and Review
The assignment is to review a restaurant ----exploring points of inclusivity, diversity, and conflict from varied audience perspectives.. Write a personal response and reflection of the experience..
Rubric Code: X232A7C
By broylesk
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Qualities and Criteria
  Excellent

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Developing

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Did Not Attempt

(N/A)

Summary of Observations

Excellent

Gives reader a clear and detailed understanding of the venue, the nature of the hospitality extended, and the menu including highlighted offerings.Careful observation and logical inferences reported.
Proficient

Gives reader somewhat detailed understanding of the venue, the nature of the hospitality extended, and the menu. .Careful observation and logical inferences reported.
Developing

Gives reader a general understanding of the venue. Mention of the nature of the hospitality extended, or the menu may be missing or under-developed. Observations reported, but few inferences logically supported by observations.
Poor

Fails to provide reader a clear and detailed understanding of the venue, the nature of the hospitality extended, and/or the menu. No careful observation, nor informed inference a part of the review.
Did Not Attempt

No clear understanding of the experience is offered.
Analysis of Experience

Excellent

Addresses all aspects of the prompt
Provides evidence of critical thinking
Avoids simple explanations of cultural cues and audiences needs, Exercises insight with phrasing, terminology, and when offering faith-based insight.
Proficient

Addresses most aspects of the prompt, with minor lapses
Provides evidence of critical thinking and mostly avoids over simplifying audience needs, Exercises insight with phrasing, terminology, and when offering faith-based insight.
Developing

Addresses some aspects of the prompt, with some major lapses
Provides limited critical thinking about the purposes of the observations or the needs of the audience.
Poor

Does not address the prompt
Provides no critical thinking and only a summary of what occurred
No audience-focused insight is attempted.
Did Not Attempt

No analysis is apparent
Personal Reflection

Excellent

Reflection flows well and integrates learning from the coursework as well as the field experience. Expression of some personal reaction to the experience with a clear recommendation -- whether negative, positive, or somewhere in between to audience.
Proficient

Good overall reaction is presented. Reflection of what was personally learned from the field work in relation to the course in evidence. Clear recommendations offered chosen constituency.
Developing

Some reflection, but lacks in ability to relate to what was learned through the field work. No clear insight into why there is or isn't a recommendation offered.
Poor

Little to no personal reaction included. No recommendation based on personal experience.
Did Not Attempt

No personal reaction included
Grammar & Formatting

Excellent

Very clear and organized ideas
Correct length (3-4 paragraphs)
Uses complete sentences throughout
Virtually free of grammar and spelling errors
Proficient

Organization is clear in presentation of ideas Appropriate length (3-4 paragraphs or the equivalent multi-modal artifact and script)
Uses complete sentences, with minor lapses. Few errors
in grammar and usage
Developing

Some outline attempted in organization of ideas
Length is not met ( 1-2 paragraphs or the equivalent multi-modal artifact and script)
Lapses in grammar and syntax. Errors may interfere with meaning.
Poor

Does not follow an organized outline of ideas
Length is too short (1 page or the equivalent multi-modal artifact and/or script is missing)
Difficulty understanding ideas due to improper grammar
Significant punctuation errors
Did Not Attempt

No adherence to formatting expectations in evidence.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98