iRubric: POWERPOINT- Major Events of the French Rev. rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

POWERPOINT- Major Events of the French Rev.

Group PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

The Major Events of the French Revolution PowerPoint Presentation.

Rubric Code: WXX794B

By Hollyg1973

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Grading Rubric
	Exceeds 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Poor 5 pts	Incomplete 0 pts
Content	Exceeds All required slides about the Major Events of the French Revolution included with correct information. Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner.	Good All required slides with relevant information about the Major Events of the French Revolution. Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required.	Fair Missing some slides or relevant information about the Major Events of the French Revolution. Topic is slightly discussed but more material is needed.	Poor Many slides missing or less slides OR slides do not contain relevant information about the Major Events of the French Revolution. Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on.	Incomplete The Major Events of the French Revolution PowerPoint has little or no information. No requirements met.
Agency	Exceeds The work done exceeds expectations. The effort put into this task is the best it can be by the learner. Slides are attractive. Text is legible. Graphics and effects are used throughout to enhance presentation. Information is at the advanced level and consistently supports images. At least three (3) graphics that are related and support each issue.	Good The work was done with good effort. Slides are attractive. Text is legible. More than half of the slides use graphics and effects to enhance presentation. Information adequately supports images. At least three (3) graphics that are related and support each issue.	Fair Work is done with fair effort. Slides are legible. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects. Information supports images at times. At least two (2) graphics that are related and support each issue.	Poor Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. The slides are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images. At least one (1) graphics that is minimally related to each issue.	Incomplete No graphics.
Oral Communication	Exceeds Speakers present in a loud, clear voice and do not read from screen. Speakers sound credible. Presentation goes above and beyond basic requirements. All group members contribute to the oral presentation equally.	Good Speakers present in a loud, clear voice but turns to the screen occasionally. Speakers sound somewhat credible. All group members contribute to the oral presentation equally.	Fair Speakers present in a voice that is sometimes clear but constantly refers to the presentation. Not all group members contribute to the oral presentation, or the distribution is not equal.	Poor Speakers do not present in a loud or clear voice and reads simply from the presentation. Not all group members contribute to the presentation and the distribution of material for each presenter is not equal.	Incomplete Did not participate during the presentation.
Written Communication	Exceeds Capitalization and punctuation are correct throughout the presentation. There are no grammatical errors.	Good There is one error in capitalization or punctuation OR there is one grammatical error on the presentation.	Fair There are two or more errors in capitalization or punctuation Or there are two or more grammatical errors on the presentation.	Poor There are many grammar or mechanical errors on the presentation.	Incomplete Many grammar and mechanical errors. No obvious effort towards correcting mechanical or grammar errors on the presentation.
Collaboration	Exceeds References Used a variety of credible references, properly cited Used some references, most were credible, cited properly References were sparse, and verbatim. Some citations. Little or no references. Improper citation or no citation Originality Of research. Topic researched objectively. Both points of view presented with credible details. Verifiable facts. Little evidence of research, objectivity or verifiability.	Good Work was completed mostly as a group.	Fair Sparse research, little evidence presented. Opinion rather than objectivity. Facts not verifiable.	Poor Work as completed mostly separately.	Incomplete Work completed separately.

Keywords:

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric