iRubric: 520 Ethical Theory Paper rubric

--Responses unclear or non-existent.
--Or, support for case study insufficient.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.

--Responses too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or poor for case study.
--Support for responses barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.

--Responses somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or questionable for case study.
--Support for responses sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.

--Responses interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper and appropriate for case study.
--Support for responses complex, complete, and in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.

-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.

--Consistent and appropriate voice, use of third person.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.

Section contains only 1-2 ethical theories or lacks depth.

Section is missing several ethical theories or misuses several ethical theories.

Section is missing 1-2 ethical theories or misuses 1-2 ethical theories.

Displays a clear understanding of theory to include the ethical gap, utilitarianism, individual rights, ethical dilemma, the want versus need self, and other theories.

Numerous problems exist with describing how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.

Several problems exist with describing how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.

1-2 problems exist with describing how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.

Fully describes how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.

Numerous issues with describing how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.

Several issues with describing how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.

1-2 issues with describing how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.

Fully describe how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.