iRubric: Daily Life of a Roman Civilization Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Daily Life of a Roman Civilization Rubric

Ancient Rome Research Project and Oral Presentation rubric

The student will create a project based on a given element of ancient Roman civilization. Student will work in a group or by themselves to create a lesson to teach to the class. The lesson will include comprehensive and in-depth information about their topic as well as a creative element. Individually the student will write a paper over a certain portion of their topic.

Rubric Code: UX2W3BA

By Jenmccracken

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Ancient Rome
	Exceeds (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Presentation 20 pts	N/A The student presents the information clearly and displays a complete understanding of their information. Student does not read off of prepared statement. It is evident that the student was well prepared, and lesson is engaging for other students	N/A The student presents the information fairly clear and displays a reasonable understanding of their information. Lesson is semi-engaging but more effort could have been put in	N/A The information presented is not clearly displayed throughout the project, and relied heavily on prepared statement. Not engaging.	N/A Not enough preparation was done for the presentation of the information, it therefore lacks many elements of what is expected.
Presentation Content 25 pts	N/A The presentation includes all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion.	N/A The presentation includes all relevant information; however.	N/A Does not have all of the relevant information in the presentation. There is not enough information presented. Information is presented in an unorganized fashion.	N/A The presentation is lacking in elements required. There are many gaps in information presented.
Creative Element 30 pts	N/A The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the learner is proud of his/her work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learner. The project shows complete understanding of the topic.	N/A The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put in. Shows good amount of understanding of the topic.	N/A Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed. Topic understanding is minimal.	N/A Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
Paper 25 pts	N/A Paper is in-depth over a certain aspect of the groups topic. It is easy to follow and informative. It is the proper length and cited correctly.	N/A Paper is fairly clear and displays a reasonable amount of understanding. Paper is proper length and cited correctly.	N/A Paper is not clear on information and does not meet length requirements. It is unorganized and not enough information is given.	N/A The paper is lacking in elements required. There are many gaps in information presented. Sources are not cited. Paper does not meet length requirements. Or paper covers topics that was done by another group member.
Bibliography 5 pts	N/A Sources are in correct format. There are at least 5 different sources for information.	N/A Sources are mostly in the correct format. There are 4 different sources.	N/A Sources are mostly in the correct format. There are only 3 sources.	N/A Sources are unorganized. There is only 1 source cited.
Group Participation 5 pts	N/A Student fully participated in group project. Student completed his or her role.	N/A Student mostly participated. Some other groups members had to do work for him or her.	N/A Student mostly participated. Other group members had to do their work.	N/A Student did not complete their work. Student did not particpate in group project
Total 0 pts	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A .

Keywords:

Ancient Rome

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric