iRubric: Assignment 3: Social Media Curation /PKM rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Assignment 3: Social Media Curation /PKM

Managing Information Through Curation

Assignment for RU 530

Rubric Code: UB6BW7

By joycevalenza

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Social Media Curation / PKM
	Below Standard (N/A)	Meets Standard (N/A)	Exceeds Standard (N/A)
Curation Tool 10 pts.	Below Standard Selection of a curation tool is somewhat appropriate for topic and not user friendly for target audience.	Meets Standard Selection of a curation tool is appropriate for topic and user friendly for target audience.	Exceeds Standard Selection of a curation tool is appropriate for topic, target audience, and is very user friendly for target audience.
Reading and Analysis 30 pts.	Below Standard Evidence shown in curation product and class discussion, and reflection that the student has has read, viewed and analyzed few or none of the resources curated.	Meets Standard Evidence shown in curation product and class discussion, and reflection that the student has read, viewed and analyzed some of the curated resources.	Exceeds Standard Evidence shown in curation product and class discussion, and reflection that the student has thoughtfully read, viewed and analyzed curated resources.
Selection of Curated Resources 30 pts.	Below Standard Resources curated are not thoughtful, newsworthy, useful. Student has fewer than 20 posts at time of the assessment.	Meets Standard Resources curated are moderately thoughtful, newsworthy, useful to the curator and the audience. Student has 20 posts at the time of the assessment.	Exceeds Standard Resources curated are thoughtful, newsworthy, useful to the curator and the audience. Student has more than 20 posts at the time of the assessment.
Attribution and Tagging 10 pts.	Below Standard Attribution is seamlessly embedded as a feature of the curation tool; if not, is never provided by the student. Tagging, if available in the tool, is not evident.	Meets Standard Attribution is seamlessly embedded as a feature of the curation tool; if not, is provided by the student some of the time. Tagging, if available in the tool, is used infrequently.	Exceeds Standard Attribution is seamlessly embedded as a feature of the curation tool; if not, is provided by student. Tagging, if available in the tool, is effectively used. Tagging, if available in the tool, is effectively used.
Reflection 20 pts.	Below Standard Student neglected to reflect on the curation journey in a one-two page written reflection paper in the Dropbox.	Meets Standard Students shared a less-than-detailed story of their curation journey in a one-two page written reflection paper in the Dropbox.	Exceeds Standard Students shared a detailed story about their choice of platform, how they selected, annotated and tagged content, their issues and successes and plans for curation in the future in a one-two page written reflection paper in the Dropbox.

Keywords:

curation, knowledge management

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric