iRubric: Compare/Contrast Socials Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Compare/Contrast Socials Project

Students are to compare and contrast two First Nations of Canada -including (but not limited to) their traditional territory (include map), traditional lifestyle (housing, food, etc.), relationships with newcomers in the development of Canada, and artistic expression (regalia, symbols, etc.).

Rubric Code: TX6WCA3

By msgallicano

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Compare/Contrast Project
	Excellent - 4 100 pts	Good - 3 75 pts	Fair - 2 50 pts	Poor - 1 25 pts
Comparison points	Excellent - 4 There are (4) four clear comparison examples between the Nations.	Good - 3 There are (3) three comparison examples between the Nations.	Fair - 2 There is (1) one comparison example between the Nations.	Poor - 1 Student has not provided any comparison examples between the Nations
Contrasting points	Excellent - 4 There are (4) four clear contrasting examples between the Nations.	Good - 3 There are (3) three clear contrasting examples between the Nations.	Fair - 2 There is (1) one clear contrasting example between the Nations.	Poor - 1 Student has not provided any contrasting examples between the Nations.
Project Structure	Excellent - 4 Student has included a title and distinction between the comparsions and contrasts. There is cohesion in the project and all the points make sense. There are no (or very few) grammar mistakes, and they do not take away from the overall project.	Good - 3 Project reflects a title and some distinction between the comparisons and contrasts. Cohesion is mostly present throughout. There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall project.	Fair - 2 There is no title and no distinction between the comparsions and contrasts. There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall project.	Poor - 1 There isn't any real form or format to the information of the project. Grammar is poor and makes the information difficult to understand.
Project Effort & Creativity	Excellent - 4 Project shows creativity and effort, and is aesthetically pleasing.	Good - 3 Project shows some creativity and effort, and is kind of aesthetically pleasing.	Fair - 2 Project shows limited creativity and effort, and is not really aesthetically pleasing.	Poor - 1 The project shows little to no creativity or effort, and is not aesthetically pleasing.
Presentation Aesthetics	Excellent - 4 The project clearly renders exceptional knowledge of both Nations. Project is easy to follow while student is speaking and voice level is great.	Good - 3 Considerable thought given to project, and the presentation renders a great deal of knowledge on both Nations. Student is flowing smoothly throughout.	Fair - 2 The presentation gives some knowledge of both Nations. The project is incomplete or hard to follow and/or it is difficult to see. Student is having some difficulty speaking.	Poor - 1 The project is incomplete or missing. There are multiple grammar errors while speaking.
Effectiveness of Presentation	Excellent - 4 Audience is engaged and have questions to ask.	Good - 3 Audience is engaged. No questions to ask.	Fair - 2 Audience is somewhat engaged but seem confused about the information being presented.	Poor - 1 Audience is not engaged or paying attention to the speaker.

Keywords:

Compare/Contrast Essay, Romeo and Juliet, Writing, Essays, English, Technology

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric