iRubric: Multimodal Virtual Poster rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Multimodal Virtual Poster rubric

The students will work alone or with a partner and put together a virtual poster. The poster will contain relevant information directly related to their theoretical orientation. Students will include all required components in a creative electronic poster. The poster will be uploaded to the assigned discussion board for classmates/instructor to view and discuss.

Rubric Code: TX57C2X

By AAAtrainer

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Post Graduate

Theoretical Orientation E-Poster
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 5 pts	Exceeds 10 pts
Content Knowledge -understanding of school of thought -understanding of the specific theory -description of how change occurs -past and present major theorist(s) -common therapy techniques -two specific therapeutic activities -two training opportunities -two scholarly articles	Poor The poster is lacking in elements required. There are many gaps in information presented. Confusing.	Fair Does not have all of the relevant information of the poster. There is not enough information presented. Information is presented in an unorganized fashion and is be hard to understand.	Good Poster includes all relevant information; however, it is not well-organized or easily understood..	Exceeds The poster includes all information relevant to the topic. The poster is creative, clear and concise. The student added information above what was taught in class or required for assignment.
Work quality/spelling/grammar Well organized, free of spelling & grammar mistakes.	Poor Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete. Many spelling and grammar errors.	Fair Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed. Some spelling and grammar errors.	Good The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this poster and presentation. No (or 1 or 2) spelling/grammar errors.	Exceeds The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the learner is proud of his/her work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learner. Free of all spelling/grammar errors.
Creativity	Poor Lacks graphics. Written material is not paraphrased and is unclear. Not good use of space on poster. Messy. Lacks colour, texture and visual interest.	Fair Not many graphics. Written material is not well organized. Limited use of space on poster. Some colour, texture and visual interest.	Good Contains graphics and written material is well organized. Variety of graphics, and good use of space on poster. Good colour, texture and visual interest. Shows the student spent time creating this poster.	Exceeds Contains strong graphics and written material is well organized. Excellent graphics, and good use of space on poster. Eye catching colour, texture and visual interest. Shows the student spent considerable time creating this poster. Writing is easy to read.
Format/presentation APA citations and references are included.	Poor Websites are included with no APA citations or references.	Fair APA citations and references are included with most formatted incorrectly.	Good Poster is formatted with APA citations and references with few errors.	Exceeds Poster is of exceptional quality with all material formatted in APA.

Keywords:

Theoretical Orientation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric