iRubric: World History Review Game rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

World History Review Game

Create a review game that reflects aspects of the assigned World History Time Period. Questions that show insight will earn higher marks than those that are simply recall questions. Your review game can be based on one that is already in existence such as Monopoly or Trivial Pursuit.

Rubric Code: SXC6A35

By gmhoza

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Categories
	Exceeds expectation 5 pts	Fully meets expectations 4 pts	Meets expectations 3 pts	Not yet within expectations 2 pts
World History Questions	Exceeds expectation Questions/ game cards demonstrated considerable knowledge of the World History Period assigned. Game has 30 or more cards/questions	Fully meets expectations Questions/game cards demonstrated excellent knowledge of the World History Period assigned. Game has 25-30 cards/questions	Meets expectations Questions demonstrated limited knowledge of the World History Time Period assigned. Game has between 15 and 24 cards/questions	Not yet within expectations Questions demonstrate little understanding of the World History Time Period assigned. Game has less than 15 cards/questions
Design of Review Game	Exceeds expectation Design has clear features, is easy to play and rules are well understood.	Fully meets expectations Design has partly clear features, although it may be a tad confusing to play and rules are limited.	Meets expectations Design has game features, but the game is difficult to play and rules are poorly thought out or confusing.	Not yet within expectations Design is poor, with little or no relevance to topic. No rules or instructions evident. Players cannot play the game
Project Presentation	Exceeds expectation Presentation is professional, eye-catching visually. Graphics that correlate to the time period and literature enhance the game.	Fully meets expectations Presentation is partially professional. Visually the project is attractive, but graphics may not appear thoughtful or completely relevant.	Meets expectations Presentation is minimally acceptable. Project is not visually attractive or appropriate.	Not yet within expectations Presentation is not acceptable/done, or there is no "presentation" at all.
Accuracy	Exceeds expectation All sections are complete and neat. No mistakes found in any section.	Fully meets expectations All sections are mostly complete and neat. Few mistakes found in each section.	Meets expectations All sections are partially complete and somewhat neat. Few mistakes found in each section.	Not yet within expectations All sections are incomplete and not neat. More than five mistakes found in each section, or there are no sections.
Peer Review	Exceeds expectation All players are well engaged in the game and are answering the questions asked	Fully meets expectations Most players are engaged in the game and are answering most of the questions asked	Meets expectations A few of the players are engaged in the game and are sort of answering the questions asked	Not yet within expectations Players are NOT engaged in the game and not taking the review seriously; questions are not being answered

Keywords:

Game, Review, Final project

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric