iRubric: Mini-ethnographic Thick Description rubric

--Topic interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of the task & an appropriate topic for research.
--Confirms or dispels assumptions with depth and sophistication.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--The writer uses vivid description which allows the reader to experience the culture

--Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of the task and/or a questionable topic for research.
--Confirms or dispels assumptions with some analysis.
--The writer uses some description which allows the reader to experience the culture.

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.
--Confirms or dispels assumptions with limited analysis.
--The writer uses minimal description with vague words which gives the reader a limited experience of the culture.

--Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.
--Does not address assumptions.
--The writer uses many vague words which gives the reader a confusing experience of the culture.

Chooses word for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits paper's audience and purpose. Sentences are varied, yet clearly structured and carefully focused, not long and rambling.

Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may sometimes be too general. Sentences generally clear, well structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective.

Uses relatively vague and general words, may use some inappropriate language. Sentence structure generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing.

Usually contains many awkward sentences, misuses words, employs inappropriate language.