Skip to main content
iRubric: Human Impact on Ecosystems Project rubric

iRubric: Human Impact on Ecosystems Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Human Impact on Ecosystems Project 
Human Impact Project
Students will design, evaluate, and refine a solution for reducing the impacts of human activities on the environment and biodiversity. (HS-LS2-7)
Rubric Code: PX75AWX
By Frogen
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Human Impacts on the Ecosystem
  Advanced

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Basic

2 pts

Below basic

1 pts

Design/Solution
2 pts

Advanced

The solution is exceptionally clear and easy to follow clear addresses and provides a solution for reduction of human impacts on the environment/biodiversity. It is original, logical and thought provoking.
Proficient

The solution is generally clear and can be followed. It addresses and provides a solution for reduction of human impacts on the environment/biodiversity. It is original, but not necessarily logical and/or thought provoking.
Basic

The solution lack clarity and is difficult to follow. It addresses and provides a solution for reduction of human impacts on the environment/biodiversity. It is modified from an existing idea, not very logical and/or thought provoking.
Below basic

The solution is unclear and impossible to follow. It is fails to address or provide a solution for reduction of human impacts on the environment/biodiversity or is an existing idea or is not logical and/or thought provoking. Vague plan.
Goals, tradeoffs &solution impact
2 pts

Advanced

Shows thorough and complete understanding of human impacts on the ecosystem. Includes a well-developed summary of issue and resolution. Takes into consideration potential shortcomings,but conveys the importance of the solution. Sets goals to measure the success of the proposal. Inspires audience to want to employ proposal.
Proficient

Shows substantial understanding of human impacts on the ecosystem. Includes a well-developed summary of issue and resolution. takes into consideration potential shortcomings,but conveys the importance of the solution. Sets goals , but not well realistic. l. Audience does not necessarily want to employ proposal.
Basic

Shows partial or incomplete understanding of human impacts on the ecosystem. Goals, trade-offs and the impact of the solution are not well explained. One aspect may be missing or unclear. Audience does not want to employ proposal.
Below basic

Shows misunderstanding and serious misconceptions of human impacts on ecosystem .Includes a poor summary of issue or resolution. Many holes in the proposal. Audience does not want to employ proposal.
Citations
1 pts

In text and works cited
Advanced

Work Cited page contains all elements. The page is completely accurate in format (APA) and sources contain accurate information.
Proficient

Cited page is generally accurate. in accuracies do not affect the citations a lot.
Basic

Work Cited page missing many elements or inaccurate. the Numerous errors detract from the work cited page.
Below basic

Work Cited pages has major parts missing and or there or there are major inaccuracies. There are significant errors through out.
poster
1 pts

the actual poster
Advanced

The poster is highly effective at being neat and professionally done. There are no spelling errors. It appears as though a great deal of effort was put into the poster to incorporate the human activity, impact and design proposal.
Proficient

The poster is generally effective at being neat and professionally done.. There are few spelling errors. It appears as though decent effort was put into the poster to incorporate the human activity, impact and design proposal.
Basic

The poster is somewhat effective at being neat and professionally done.. There are many spelling errors. It appears as though little effort was put into the poster to incorporate the human activity, impact and design proposal.
Below basic

The poster is ineffective at being neat and professionally done. There are many spelling errors. It appears as though no effort was put into the poster to incorporate the human activity, impact and design proposal.
Issues
2 pts

Advanced

Students presents back ground information on the populations in the past effects on human effecting lynx or bobcat populations issues exceptionally clear. Ideas are easy to follow.
Proficient

Students presents back ground information on the populations in the past effects on human effecting lynx or bobcat populations issues. generally clear
Basic

Students presentation lacks clarity back ground information on the populations in the past effects on human effecting lynx or bobcat populations issues.
Below basic

Students presents back ground information on the populations in the past effects on human effecting lynx or bobcat populations issues unclear and impossible to follow.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16