Skip to main content

iRubric: Exhibition Creative Game Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Exhibition Creative Game Rubric 
Students will incorporate information from individual research investigations into a creative game following the specified criteria.
Rubric Code: P56XX7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Creative Game
  Excellent

25 pts

Good

20 pts

Fair

15 pts

Poor

10 pts

Display Content

Excellent

Student created a folder game directly related to assigned topic. Game reflects complete understanding of topic. Game includes everything needed to play: instructions, rules, game pieces, and questions with answers.
Good

Student created a folder game related to assigned topic. Display reflects understanding of topic. Game includes almost everything needed to play: instructions, rules, game pieces, and questions with answers.
Fair

Student created a folder game that is somewhat related to assigned topic. Display reflects little to no understanding of topic. Game includes some of the items needed to play: instructions, rules, game pieces, or questions with answers.
Poor

Student created a folder game that is somewhat or not at all related to assigned topic. Display reflects student does not have an understanding of topic. Game is many many items needed for play: instructions, rules, game pieces, or questions with answers.
Work effort

Excellent

The work was done well to the best of the learners ability. Quality time and effort was put into the folder game.
Good

The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this folder game.
Fair

Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed or done with lack of effort.
Poor

Lack of effort on the learners' part. Work is incomplete. Learner is capable of doing better.
Visual appearance

Excellent

The folder game is very attractive with excellent use of color. Gameboard is neatly organized and any anatomical structures are correct. All of the terminology is spelled correctly and game contains no errors.
Good

The folder game is attractive with some use of color. Gameboard is organized and any anatomical structures are correct. Most of the terminology is spelled correctly and game contains few errors.
Fair

Overall, the folder game is attractive, but needs improvement. Gameboard is somewhat organized or anatomical structures are somwhat correct. If labeling is present, Some of the terminology is spelled correctly or game contains some errors.
Poor

Overall, the folder game is not attractive. Gameboard is not organized or anatomical structures are not correct. Much of the terminology is not spelled correctly or game contains many errors.
Materials Used

Excellent

Folder game relfects a great deal of time was spent in creation. Materials used were thought out well in advance. Materials used create immediate connection to concept and knowledge.
Good

Folder game relfects some time was spent in creation. Materials used were thought out in advance. Materials used create connection to concept and knowledge.
Fair

Folder game relfects little to no time was spent in creation. Materials used were not well thought out in advance. Materials used create confussion or there is little connection to concept or knowledge.
Poor

Folder game relfects very little to no time was spent in creation. Materials used were not well thought out. Materials used create confussion or are not connected to topic. Lack of knowledge is evident.
Research

Excellent

Student turned in all of research obtained during class time in addition to outside work. Suggested sites were utilized. No evidence of "cut and paste." Adhered to suggestions from daily grades.
Good

Student turned in all of research obtained during class time. Suggested sites were used or other acceptable sites were provided. No evidence of "cut and paste." Some suggestions from daily grades were used.
Fair

Student turned in work obtained during class but was not substantial. Elementary sites were used. Some Evidence of "cut and paste." Some suggestions from daily grades were used.
Poor

Student turned in very little work or none at all. Unapproved or elementary sites used. No references provided. Evidence of "cut and paste." Suggestions from daily grades not used.
Creativity

Excellent

Folder game was very creative. Appearance is neat, well thought out, and obvious effort was made to create folder game directly related to topic.
Good

Folder game was somewhat creative. Appearance is neat, thought out, and some effort was made to create folder game related to topic.
Fair

Folder game was somewhat creative. Appearance is neat but not thought out. More time was needed to show effort was made to create folder game related to topic.
Poor

Folder game was not creative. Appearance is only somewhat neat or not neat at all. Not thought out or evidence of effort was not made to create folder game related to topic.
Daily Assignments

Excellent

Folder game shows connection of daily assignments and information learned. Criteria completely met and progress is very evident.
Good

Folder game shows some connection of daily assignments and information learned. Criteria somewhat met or progress is somewhat evident.
Fair

Folder game shows little to no connection of daily assignments and information learned. Criteria only somewhat met or not at all. Progress is only somewhat evident or not evident at all.
Poor

Folder game shows no connection of daily assignments and information learned. Criteria not at all. Progress is not evident at all.
Group Reflection

Excellent

Folder game is direct or complete reflection of group work. Game is complete reflection / connection to group information. Group obviously functioned as a group.
Good

Folder game is almost a complete reflection of group work. Game shows reflection / connection to group information. Evidence of group functioning as a group is present.
Fair

Folder game is only somewhat or not very reflective of group work. Game shows little to no reflection / connection to group information. Evidence of group functioning as a group is present or not present at all.
Poor

Folder game is not very reflective of group work. Game shows no reflection / connection to group information. Evidence of group functioning as a group is not present at all.



Keywords:
  • display







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58