Skip to main content
iRubric: Rule of Life Project: Paper rubric

iRubric: Rule of Life Project: Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rule of Life Project: Paper 
Reflection paper
This is a rubric designed to guide the student in developing a paper reflecting the integration of critical thinking, incorporation of the course text, and personal experience.
Rubric Code: P2X828B
By treiger
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Philosophy  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Rule of Life Paper
Student will develop a written document that thoroughly describes their rule of life. Paper must be a minimum of 1,750 words, double-spaced, Times New Roman font size 11.
  Excellent

The writer completely covers all required information in depth and with eloquence.

10 pts

Good

The writer does a good job of covering most or all of the required information.

7 pts

Fair

The writer has given mediocre coverage of the required material, and more information is needed.

5 pts

Poor

The writer has done a poor job of providing the required information.

3 pts

Fail

Student did not submit a paper, or the paper was unsatisfactory.

0 pts

Overall Content
10 %

The writer provides a thorough explanation of the topic.
Excellent

All of the required components of the paper are present. Content is well-developed with cited supporting resources. The paper reflects collegiate-level work.
Good

Most of the required components of the paper are present, but some additional information is needed. The content is adequately-developed, and the paper reflects decent collegiate-level work.
Fair

Several of the required components are missing or have been poorly-developed. More information is needed to complete the content. The paper reflects mediocre work.
Poor

The paper is minimally-developed and reflects poor work. Several required components are missing.
Fail

The student did not submit a paper or the content is completely unsatisfactory.
Critical Thinking
5 %

The writer uses logical and critical thinking in reflecting on theme and cited texts. Derives insights from texts/materials discussed in class.
Excellent

Implications are clearly explicated and the content demonstrates excellent critical thinking skills and independent thought processes.
Good

One or more implications are given and are sufficiently clarified, and the content reflects adequate critical thinking skills and mostly independent thought.
Fair

Content reflects mediocre exercise of critical thinking and little independent thought.
Poor

Content reflects minimal or no exercise of independent critical thinking at all.
Fail

The student did not submit a paper or the critical thinking component is completely unsatisfactory.
Textbook Integration
5 %

Integrates related course materials and insights derived from critical thinking and personal experience.
Excellent

The student's writing reflects a distinctive understanding and integration of the text with personal experience, and offers deep relevant insights.
Good

The student offers an adequate understanding and integration of the text with personal experience. The paper reflects a good attempt to integrate/synthesize experiences and insights.
Fair

The student's writing reflects a mediocre attempt to integrate/synthesize. Insights are poor or weak, and the material needs further explanation.
Poor

The student's writing reflects a minimal attempt to relate the text with personal insight, and insights are not provided.
Fail

The student did not submit a paper, or the textbook integration component is unsatisfactory.
Grammar & Organization
5 %

The grammar and organization of the paper is collegiate-level.
Excellent

The paper is very well organized and the content is logical and understandable in layout. No grammatical errors are present.
Good

The paper has decent organization and logical flow. No or few grammatical errors are present.
Fair

The paper reflects mediocre organization, and contains some grammatical errors.
Poor

The paper is poorly organized and contains several grammatical errors.
Fail

The student did not submit a paper, or the grammar and organizational component is unsatisfactory.



Keywords:
  • Grad, reflection



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98