Skip to main content
iRubric: GROUP WORK- a 15 Minute Short (narrative film) rubric

iRubric: GROUP WORK- a 15 Minute Short (narrative film) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
GROUP WORK- a 15 Minute Short (narrative film) 
The final version of the script, storyboard, shot list and production schedule are to be submitted with the final version of the video. However the students will be required to present the working versions of the documents before shooting their narrative film.
Rubric Code: MXAC323
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric 15-Minute Short Film
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Script

Excellent

Complete script for entire film turned in by deadline. Includes all dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and technical notes.
Good

Complete script for entire film turned in close to deadline. Includes most dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and technical notes.
Fair

Partial script or missed deadline. Missing significant amount of dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and/or technical notes.
Poor

Did not turn in script at all or what was turned in cannot be called a film
Storyboards/Shot List/ Schedule

Excellent

Complete set of storyboard covering all of the scenes, a schedule and shot list for entire film turned in by deadline. Shot list follows example, and includes shots for entire film.
Good

Complete set of storyboards for entire film turned in by deadline. Shot list follows example, and includes shots for entire film.
OR
Set of storyboards for majority of film turned in by deadline. Shot list follows example, and includes shots for majority of film.
Fair

Only storyboards, schedule, OR shot list turned in.
Poor

No storyboards. No shot list. No schedule turned in
Editing

Excellent

All the shots enhance the viewer’s understanding and set the tone for the video.

Shots are sequenced in a coherent way.

Transitions and cuts are well executed.

Special effects and graphics are appropriate and enhance the story

Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are all of an exceptional technical standard and enhance the film


Transitions and cuts are well executed

Credits are comprehensiv
Good

Most of the shots included in the edit enhance the viewer’s understanding and set the tone for the video.

Shots are mostly sequenced in a manner that helps to tell the story in a coherent way.

Transitions and cuts are executed well for the most part

Special effects and graphics are mostly appropriate but there are instances where they do not help to enhance the story

Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are of a high standard
Fair

Only some of the shots edited enhance the viewer’s understanding and set the tone for the video.

Shots are not sequenced in a coherent way in several instances

Transitions and cuts are not executed well in several instances

Special effects and graphics are mostly inappropriate but there are instances where they do help to enhance the story

Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are of a high standard for the most part
Poor

Shots are not sequenced in a logical manner that helps to tell the story.

The edit is largely incoherent with only some instances of good edits

Transitions and cuts are poorly executed or not used when needed

Special effects and graphics are mostly inappropriate and do nothing to enhance the story

Audio including: the dialogue, Foley and sound tracks are of a low technical standard or are inappropriate
Plot/Dramatic Structure

Excellent

Plot has clear beginning, middle, and end. Dramatic structure builds to climax, then ends with falling action.
Good

Plot has mostly clear beginning, middle, and end. Dramatic structure is generally followed, but wanders in places. Climax of story is clear.
Fair

Plot is difficult to follow, and lacks either a clear beginning, middle, or end. Dramatic structure is only somewhat followed, and actions seem random.
Poor

The plot is not evident. Instead there is a collection of random actions with nothing tying them together.
Character Development

Excellent

All characters are as thoroughly fleshed-out as the story requires. Clear protagonist and antagonist.
Good

Most characters are as thoroughly fleshed-out as the story requires. Main characters are clear, but their roles in the story may not be.
Fair

Some characters are developed, but at least half are just people on the screen. It is unclear whose story the film is telling
Poor

Everyone who appears on screen is immediately forgettable. No real character development to speak of.



Keywords:
  • short film, performance output, group work







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16