Skip to main content
iRubric: Newcast Segment Rubric

iRubric: Newcast Segment Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Newcast Segment Rubric 
Mrs. Dirks LEP Biology Oral Presentation Evaluation
Evaluates the key components of an effective oral presentation.
Rubric Code: M982W8
By tnb0973
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Oral Presentation Evaluation
  Awesome

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Needs work

2 pts

Showed No Effort

0 pts

Presenter's Knowledge

Presentation shows clear evidence of understanding/comprehension of the vocabulary
Awesome

Presenter demonstrated a deep understanding of the material, supported by concise examples
Good

Presenter demonstrated a adequate understanding of the material, supported by a examples.
Fair

Presenter demonstrated a fair to somewhat weak understanding of the material. Material was not adequately supported by an examples.
Needs work

Presenter demonstrated a very weak understanding of the material. Material was not supported by an examples.
Showed No Effort

Presenter demonstrated no understanding of the material. Did not provide any examples.
Facts- Information

Student shows understanding of topic.
Awesome

Presenter gave clear and concise facts and explanations of how these facts support the topic of this presentation.
Good

Presenter gave concise facts and was somewhat complete with explanations of how these facts support the topic of the presentation.
Fair

Presenter failed to give complete facts and some were confusing as to how they supported the topic of the presentation.
Needs work

Presenter did not provide adequate facts or explanations. Did not relate to topic.
Showed No Effort

Presenter provided no facts or explanations.
Organization

Cohesiveness and flow.
Awesome

Presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was easy to follow. Stays on topic throughout the presentation
Good

Presenter was organized in the delivery of this presentation. For the most part it was not confusing to .follow.Somewhat stays on topic throughout the presentation
Fair

Presenter was disorganized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was unclear and confusing to follow. Struggles to stay on topic.
Needs work

Presenter was extremely disorganized in the delivery. Extremely unclear, unable to focus. Does not stay on topic. Completely disorganized.
Showed No Effort

No delivery of presentation.
Preparation and Delivery

The student was ready to give their presentation on the due date and demonstrated confidence and understanding.
Awesome

Presenter was well prepared to give his or her presentation and was well rehearsed. Constant eye contact with audience and did not use q-cards.
Good

Presenter was somewhat prepared to give his/her presentation but could have used more time to rehearse. Moderate eye contact and used q-cards.
Fair

Presenter was not prepared to give his/her presentation and needed more time to rehearse. Presenter struggled to avoid q-cards and very briefly gave eye contact.
Needs work

Presenter was not prepared to give the presentation and obviously did not rehearse at all. Relied heavily upon reading cards. No eye contact.
Showed No Effort

No delivery was made.
Working in a Cooperative Group

The student worked well in a group of their peers.
Awesome

The group worked extremely well together. Each member took an active role in the project. Stayed on task and focused.
Good

The group worked well together. Most members took an active role in the project. Needed to be reminded to stay on task and focused once.
Fair

The group was able to work together most of the time. One or two members did not participate in the project. Needed to be reminded occasionally to stay on task and focused.
Needs work

Group did not work well together most of the time. More than two members did not participate in the project. Needed frequent reminding to stay of task and focused.
Showed No Effort

Group did not work together. No evidence was shown of talking with one another. Most members did not participate in the project. Needed constant reminding to stay on task and focused.
Duration of Presentation

The newscast segments was within the time limit.
Awesome

The presentation was no less than 9 minutes and not longer than 11 minutes. It wasn't hurried or too slow.
Good

The presentation was 9 minutes long. It was SLIGHTLY hurried or too slow.
Fair

The presentation was 7 minutes long. It was VERY hurried or too slow.
Needs work

The presentation was 6 minutes long. It was VERY hurried or too slow.
Showed No Effort

The presentation was either too long or too short.



Keywords:
  • Oral presentation evaluation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16