- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Evaluating Technologies rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Evaluating Technologies Kahoot Creation Rubric Code: M223W93 By hannahhedden Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: ePortfolio Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Evaluating Technologies
	Outstanding 5 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts
Ease of Use	Outstanding Web Editor is extremely easy to use	Excellent Web Editor is easy to use.	Fair Web Editor takes time to learn how to properly use.	Poor Web Editor is difficult to use.	Unacceptable Web Editor is extremely difficult to use; takes too much time to learn how to use for given time.
Accessibility	Outstanding Web Editor is extremely easy to access as an editor and a viewer.	Excellent Web Editor is easy to access as both an editor and viewer.	Fair Web Editor takes time to access as both an editor and viewer.	Poor Web Editor is difficult to access as both an editor and viewer.	Unacceptable Web Editor is extremely difficult to access as both an editor and viewer.
Formatting Options/Design	Outstanding Web Editor provides effective layout, formatting, and design options that allows for visual appeal.	Excellent Web Editor provides a good amount of effective layout, formatting, and design options.	Fair Web Editor provides a few design options, layouts, and formatting options.	Poor Web Editor provides basically no design options, layouts, and formatting options.	Unacceptable Web Editor doesn't provide any design, formatting, or layout options. No visual appeal is possible using the tools provided.
Content	Outstanding The overall content on the Web Editor provides support for multiple file types, font options, and information that allows for all necessary materials to be included and embedded.	Excellent The overall content on the Web Editor provides a good amount of support for files, font options, and information that allows for the necessary materials to be included.	Fair The overall content on the Web Editor is decent. There are a few file types supported, a few font options, and minimal information.	Poor The overall content on the Web Editor is minimal. There are basically no font options, most files can't be included, not enough information present.	Unacceptable The overall content on the Web Editor is poor. There are no font options, no files are supported, and there is no other information that will allow for all the necessary materials to be included.